To: Mrs. Don-o
His true, Eucharistic body and blood have the appearance and chemical characteristics of bread and wine. They are nevertheless what He says they are. He was wearing His body and using His blood at the time.. so it could not have been the real actual "body of Christ" could it ??
BTW there is a question if the resurrected Jesus even had any blood.. He said He was flesh and bone? not flesh and blood.. Might Jesus have shed every drop of His blood for our salvation?? Does a resurrected body need blood??
To: RnMomof7
"He was wearing His body and using His blood at the time.. so it could not have been the real actual "body of Christ" could it ?" Why not? "For man it is not possible. or God all things are possible."
You might be wondering whether Jesus can bilocate. The answer is: yes. He can not just bilocate, He can omnilocate.
141 posted on
06/26/2015 5:08:32 PM PDT by
Mrs. Don-o
("The further a society drifts from truth, the more it will hate those who speak it." - George Orwell)
To: RnMomof7
Do you think that when Adam called Eve "bone of my bone and flesh of my flesh," he was pointedly
excluding her blood?
Where'd she get her soft tissues from?
Any mention of stem cells?
(Talk about reductio ad absurdum...)
142 posted on
06/26/2015 5:13:56 PM PDT by
Mrs. Don-o
("The further a society drifts from truth, the more it will hate those who speak it." - George Orwell)
To: RnMomof7
"or" = "for"
((((sigh)))))
143 posted on
06/26/2015 5:15:04 PM PDT by
Mrs. Don-o
("The further a society drifts from truth, the more it will hate those who speak it." - George Orwell)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson