Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The First 10 Popes of the Catholic Church
St. Peter's List ^ | December 17, 2012 | SPL Staff

Posted on 06/20/2015 12:42:46 PM PDT by rwa265

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 281-299 next last
To: RnMomof7

Excvellent!


101 posted on 06/20/2015 6:01:48 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Pray for us sinners, now and at the hour of our death. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7

Excellent!


102 posted on 06/20/2015 6:01:59 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Pray for us sinners, now and at the hour of our death. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
At the risk of the Eslie bird pecking me, here is his excellent cahrt:

 
Is Peter the 'rock'?
 


NIV Matthew 4:18-19
 18.  As Jesus was walking beside the Sea of Galilee, he saw two brothers, Simon called Peter and his brother Andrew. They were casting a net into the lake, for they were fishermen.
 19.  "Come, follow me," Jesus said, "and I will make you fishers of men."
 
NIV Matthew 8:14
  When Jesus came into Peter's house, he saw Peter's mother-in-law lying in bed with a fever.
 
NIV Matthew 10:1-2
 1.  He called his twelve disciples to him and gave them authority to drive out evil  spirits and to heal every disease and sickness.
 2.  These are the names of the twelve apostles: first, Simon (who is called Peter) and his brother Andrew; James son of Zebedee, and his brother John;
 
NIV Matthew 14:28-31
 28.  "Lord, if it's you," Peter replied, "tell me to come to you on the water."
 29.  "Come," he said.   Then Peter got down out of the boat, walked on the water and came toward Jesus.
 30.  But when he saw the wind, he was afraid and, beginning to sink, cried out, "Lord, save me!"
 31.  Immediately Jesus reached out his hand and caught him. "You of little faith," he said, "why did you doubt?"
 
NIV Matthew 15:13-16
 13.  He replied, "Every plant that my heavenly Father has not planted will be pulled up by the roots.
 14.  Leave them; they are blind guides.  If a blind man leads a blind man, both will fall into a pit."
 15.  Peter said, "Explain the parable to us."
 16.  "Are you still so dull?" Jesus asked them.
 

As you can see, Simon was already known as 'Peter'
BEFORE the following verses came along.....


NIV Matthew 16:13-18
 13.  When Jesus came to the region of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, "Who do people say the Son of Man is?"
 14.  They replied, "Some say John the Baptist; others say Elijah; and still others, Jeremiah or one of the prophets."
 15.  "But what about you?" he asked. "Who do you say I am?"
 16.  Simon Peter answered, "You are the Christ,  the Son of the living God."
 17.  Jesus replied, "
Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah, for this was not revealed to you by man, but by my Father in heaven.
 18.  And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades  will not overcome it.
 19.  I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven; whatever you bind on earth will be  bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven."

NIV 1 Corinthians 10:4
   and drank the same spiritual drink; for they drank from the spiritual rock that accompanied them, and that rock was Christ.
 
NIV Luke 6:48
   He is like a man building a house, who dug down deep and laid the foundation on rock. When a flood came, the torrent struck that house but could not shake it, because it was well built.
 
NIV Romans 9:33
  As it is written: "See, I lay in Zion a stone that causes men to stumble and a rock that makes them fall, and the one who trusts in him will never be put to shame."
 
 
 
NIV 1 Peter 2:4-8
 4.  As you come to him, the living Stone--rejected by men but chosen by God and precious to him--
 5.  you also, like living stones, are being built into a spiritual house to be a holy priesthood, offering spiritual sacrifices acceptable to God through Jesus Christ.
 6.  For in Scripture it says: "See, I lay a stone in Zion, a chosen and precious cornerstone, and the one who trusts in him will never be put to shame."
 7.  Now to you who believe, this stone is precious. But to those who do not believe, "The stone the builders rejected has become the capstone, "
 8.  and, "A stone that causes men to stumble and a rock that makes them fall." They stumble because they disobey the message--which is also what they were destined for.


But, since there WAS no NT at the time Christ spoke to Peter, just what DID Peter and the rest of the Disciples know about ROCKS???

 

NIV Genesis 49:24-25
 24.  But his bow remained steady, his strong arms stayed limber, because of the hand of the Mighty One of Jacob, because of the Shepherd, the Rock of Israel,
 25.  because of your father's God, who helps you, because of the Almighty,  who blesses you with blessings of the heavens above, blessings of the deep that lies below, blessings of the breast and womb.
 
NIV Numbers 20:8
   "Take the staff, and you and your brother Aaron gather the assembly together. Speak to that rock before their eyes and it will pour out its water. You will bring water out of the rock for the community so they and their livestock can drink."
 
NIV Deuteronomy 32:4
  He is the Rock, his works are perfect, and all his ways are just. A faithful God who does no wrong, upright and just is he.
 
NIV Deuteronomy 32:15
   Jeshurun  grew fat and kicked; filled with food, he became heavy and sleek. He abandoned the God who made him and rejected the Rock his Savior.
 
NIV Deuteronomy 32:18
  You deserted the Rock, who fathered you; you forgot the God who gave you birth.
 
NIV Deuteronomy 32:30-31
 30.  How could one man chase a thousand, or two put ten thousand to flight, unless their Rock had sold them, unless the LORD had given them up?
 31.  For their rock is not like our Rock, as even our enemies concede.
 
NIV 1 Samuel 2:2
  "There is no one holy  like the LORD; there is no one besides you; there is no Rock like our God.
 
NIV 2 Samuel 22:2-3
 2.  He said: "The LORD is my rock, my fortress and my deliverer;
 3.  my God is my rock, in whom I take refuge, my shield and the horn  of my salvation. He is my stronghold, my refuge and my savior-- from violent men you save me.
 
NIV 2 Samuel 22:32
  For who is God besides the LORD? And who is the Rock except our God?
 
NIV 2 Samuel 22:47
  "The LORD lives! Praise be to my Rock! Exalted be God, the Rock, my Savior!
 
NIV 2 Samuel 23:3-4
 3.  The God of Israel spoke, the Rock of Israel said to me: `When one rules over men in righteousness, when he rules in the fear of God,
 4.  he is like the light of morning at sunrise on a cloudless morning, like the brightness after rain that brings the grass from the earth.'
 
NIV Psalms 18:2
  The LORD is my rock, my fortress and my deliverer; my God is my rock, in whom I take refuge. He is my shield and the horn  of my salvation, my stronghold.
 
NIV Psalms 18:31
   For who is God besides the LORD? And who is the Rock except our God?
 
NIV Psalms 18:46
  The LORD lives! Praise be to my Rock! Exalted be God my Savior!
 
NIV Psalms 19:14
   May the words of my mouth and the meditation of my heart be pleasing in your sight, O LORD, my Rock and my Redeemer.
 
NIV Psalms 28:1
   To you I call, O LORD my Rock; do not turn a deaf ear to me. For if you remain silent, I will be like those who have gone down to the pit.
 
NIV Psalms 31:2-3
 2.  Turn your ear to me, come quickly to my rescue; be my rock of refuge, a strong fortress to save me.
 3.  Since you are my rock and my fortress, for the sake of your name lead and guide me.
 
NIV Psalms 42:9
   I say to God my Rock, "Why have you forgotten me? Why must I go about mourning, oppressed by the enemy?"
 
NIV Psalms 62:2
   He alone is my rock and my salvation; he is my fortress, I will never be shaken.
 
NIV Psalms 62:6
   He alone is my rock and my salvation; he is my fortress, I will not be shaken.
 
NIV Psalms 62:7
   My salvation and my honor depend on God ; he is my mighty rock, my refuge.
 
NIV Psalms 71:3
   Be my rock of refuge, to which I can always go; give the command to save me, for you are my rock and my fortress.
 
NIV Psalms 78:35
   They remembered that God was their Rock, that God Most High was their Redeemer.
 
NIV Psalms 89:26
   He will call out to me, `You are my Father, my God, the Rock my Savior.'
 
NIV Psalms 92:14-15
 14.  They will still bear fruit in old age, they will stay fresh and green,
 15.  proclaiming, "The LORD is upright; he is my Rock, and there is no wickedness in him."
 
NIV Psalms 95:1
   Come, let us sing for joy to the LORD; let us shout aloud to the Rock of our salvation.
 
NIV Psalms 144:1
   Praise be to the LORD my Rock, who trains my hands for war, my fingers for battle.
 
NIV Isaiah 17:10
   You have forgotten God your Savior; you have not remembered the Rock, your fortress.
 
NIV Isaiah 26:4
   Trust in the LORD forever, for the LORD, the LORD, is the Rock eternal.
 
NIV Isaiah 30:29
 And you will sing as on the night you celebrate a holy festival; your hearts will rejoice as when people go up with flutes to the mountain of the LORD, to the Rock of Israel.
 
NIV Isaiah 44:8
   Do not tremble, do not be afraid. Did I not proclaim this and foretell it long ago? You are my witnesses. Is there any God besides me? No, there is no other Rock; I know not one." 
 
NIV Habakkuk 1:12
   O LORD, are you not from everlasting? My God, my Holy One, we will not die. O LORD, you have appointed them to execute judgment; O Rock, you have ordained them to punish.

.....No other rock.............
 
And now you know the Biblical position!


30 posted on 06/19/2015 12:36:38 PM PDT by Elsie ( Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)

103 posted on 06/20/2015 6:05:29 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Is it really all relative, Mister Einstein?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
I don't see anything there to particularly disagree with.

As a Catholic, I even agree that "Jesus fulfilled that law of sin and death and has entered the Holy of Holies ONCE FOR ALL FOREVER. Taking the Eucharist is a remembrance of this once fore all forever, not a repetition of it."

We don't see the Eucharist as a "repetition" of Christ's once-and-for-all, forever sacrifice, but as a "participation" in it. It is the One self-same sacrifice, made present to us, offered by the One priest, Jesus Christ Our Lord.

104 posted on 06/20/2015 6:06:39 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Pray for us sinners, now and at the hour of our death. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

S’Awright!


105 posted on 06/20/2015 6:08:05 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Pray for us sinners, now and at the hour of our death. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
.
>> “Jesus fulfilled that law of sin and death...” <<

.
Do more reading!

He fulfilled the first three appointed times.

There are four more times to be fulfilled.

When the last is fulfilled, the Earth and heavens will be gone, there having been found no place for them.

(revelation 20:11 “And I saw a great white throne, and him that sat on it, from whose face the earth and the heaven fled away; and there was found no place for them.)

106 posted on 06/20/2015 6:10:55 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

My point was for the purpose of countering Peter as somehow greater in apostleship than Paul. God chose both, used both, and we’ve all benefitted from it. You’re correct in that Peter wasn’t ONLY an apostle to Jews. Paul wasn’t ONLY an apostle to the Gentiles, either. Yet I didn’t invent their designation as such in Scripture. It’s there.

To my original curiosity, if Paul was really the one God primarily used to preach the gospel to the Gentiles, why don’t Catholics—who are mainly Gentiles—give him credit? All those points I alluded to from Galatians are arguments Paul used to defend his apostolic ministry from the charge that it was somehow inferior to that of “pillars” like Cephas and James.

God shows no partiality. Neither should we.


107 posted on 06/20/2015 6:14:00 PM PDT by avenir (I'm pessimistic about man, but I'm optimistic about GOD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o
"We don't see the Eucharist as a "repetition" of Christ's once-and-for-all, forever sacrifice, but as a "participation" in it. It is the One self-same sacrifice, made present to us, offered by the One priest, Jesus Christ Our Lord."

If this were so for posting catholics they would not be insisting that they drink the literal blood and eat the literal flesh of Christ. Way back in Genesis 6 God forbade eating the blood, for the life is in the blood. Apparently the word cannibalizing is foreign to some. God is not going to be mocked much longer by this sham, mocking ritual. Jesus established a remembrance, not a continuous participation. The Passover meal they were eating that night was not a continuous participation, it was a remembrance. And Jews remember that God in several places told them NEVER EAT THE BLOOD. Jesus established a remembrance using a metaphorical process, not a continuous participation. ONLY Jesus was worthy of the glory of that work He did for us. Insisting the Eucharist eats His literal body and drinks His literal blood is a blasphemy and makes the participant unworthy of the Glory due only to Him yet He offered it to us as Grace. You're playing word games calling a repetition a 'participation'. But if that is what you believe you nedd, to play games with words and ignore God's commands from Genesis through the Torah, you are free to do so.

108 posted on 06/20/2015 6:16:27 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Is it really all relative, Mister Einstein?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

Somehow I knew satan would wake you up to come peck up the seed.


109 posted on 06/20/2015 6:18:56 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Is it really all relative, Mister Einstein?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: metmom; steve8714
Jesus told Peter his name was Petros.

He did not tell Peter that his name was *petra*.

He also told him that his name was Cephas

John 1:42 He brought him to Jesus. Jesus looked at him and said, "You are Simon the son of John; you shall be called Cephas " (which is translated Peter).

◄ 2786. Képhas ► Strong's Concordance

Képhas: "a rock," Cephas, a name given to the apostle Peter Original Word: Κηφᾶς, ᾶ, ὁ Part of Speech: Noun, Masculine Transliteration: Képhas Phonetic Spelling: (kay-fas') Short Definition: Cephas Definition: Cephas (Aramaic for rock), the new name given to Simon Peter, the apostle.

How do you all dodge that or try and twist it?

110 posted on 06/20/2015 6:29:52 PM PDT by verga (I might as well be playng chess with pigeons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone

Like I said mine has been documented, still waiting for you all. And the play ground is for the very immature, which explains why prots are so comfortable there.


111 posted on 06/20/2015 6:31:26 PM PDT by verga (I might as well be playng chess with pigeons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: rwa265
To understand St. Peter, one must first understand Christ and the Church Christ came to establish. Jesus is the “Son of David” and his life and ministry fulfilled the Old Testament prophecies of the New Davidic Kingdom and New Jerusalem;

When they start out with a lie right from the get-go, it's easy to make it up beyond that...

112 posted on 06/20/2015 6:44:27 PM PDT by Iscool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

I typed a couple of words in a scramble there, if you would like to send to me another LOL at my mistakes, so you can once again ignore what is offered to you in agape.


113 posted on 06/20/2015 6:49:32 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Is it really all relative, Mister Einstein?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: verga; metmom

Well I’ve not seem them that I can recall. As you wanted metmom to post her degrees you need to.....if you have them as you claim. Of course anyone can make stuff up on a bog.


114 posted on 06/20/2015 7:15:14 PM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: verga; ealgeone
Still waiting on the prots to even say what denomination they call their own.

That's because genuine born again, born from above, regenerated by the Holy Spirit believers are already a part of the actual body of Christ, not part of any man-made religious organization that claims to be the one true church.

Denominations are meaningless. They don't save. I follow Christ, not men.

115 posted on 06/20/2015 7:21:04 PM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
It's not just I, or some random Catholic, who says this is "real flesh" and "real blood." You'll get that from Jesus Himself in John 6.

The charge of cannibalism fails, because cannibalism is eating parts of a dead human.

The Eucharist isn't "parts," and Our Lord isn't "dead."

The Eucharist is the Whole Christ as He is: Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity, our resurrected Lord; and alive, not dead, even "more alive" than He was when He walked this earth, since He has conquered sin and death, and is not bound by the limits of time and space.

That part is important. We are bound by the laws of physics, time and space and so forth. Christ is not. His flesh is glorious, unbounded by physical laws, deathless, eternal, real in exactly the same way that the Resurrection is real.

The OT prohibition against blood is not because it was too filthy, but because it was too sacred. According to the Hebrew understanding, the Life is in the blood; and God alone is the Lord and Giver of Life.

Remember that this is not of the Old Law, but rather, as Jesus said, of the New. (Luke 22:20) "And likewise the cup after they had eaten, saying, “This cup is the New Covenant in my blood, which will be shed for you." It's a mistake to apply the Old Covenant prohibition of the consumption of blood, here. Consuming Jesus' blood does not violate the Old Covenant: it fulfills it.

John 6 simply prepared the way for Jesus commanding, "Eat My Body; Drink My Blood." This is "the New Covenant in My Blood" : we are invited to approach for the most sacred contact with God that is possible on this earth.

We do not receive our Lord in a cannibalistic form. We receive him in the Eucharistic form, under the appearances (the physical characteristics) of bread and wine. The two are qualitatively different. My digestive processes are not digesting and dissolving Jesus Christ; they are digesting the forms (appearances) of bread and wine. In "taking and eating" the Eucharist, my "digestion" doesn't affect or change Christ at all. It is I who change.

I avoid the term "literal" body, because people generally mean by it, physiological: that is, a body that maintains a 97-98 degree core temperature, that manifests respiratory reflexes, etc. etc. The Eucharist is not a physiological body, it is His "real" Body.

If by "literal" you mean, are you chewing up and swallowing cardiac muscle, pancreas, lungs, bone marrow, brain, spleen, and roughly 6 to 8 pounds --- two square meters--- of skin? The answer is "No." But if you ask "Are you consuming the Real Body of Christ?" The answer is "Yes."

"Literal" thinking would be what Jesus would characterize as "carnal." "Carnal thinking." Meat-head thinking. When He says "the flesh" avails nothing, He doesn't mean HIS Flesh avails nothing. (He's just said over and over that HIS Flesh avails us eternal life.)

He means "Your flesh"--- your meat-head thinking--- avails nothing.

HIS flesh corresponds to Malachi's prophecy:

Malachi 1:11
From the rising of the sun to its setting,
my name will be great among the Gentiles;
Incense offerings will be made to my name everywhere,
and a pure offering;
For my name is great among the Gentiles,
says the Lord of hosts."

"From the rising of the sun to its setting" is a term for geographical expanse, that is to say, the whole world, from East to West. It alludes to the concept of "time," too: at all times.

Where do you find, throughout the whole world, and among the Gentiles, this sacrifice? And a pure sacrifice: corresponding to the Name of the Lord being great among non-Jewish nations?

This is a prophecy of the Eucharist, which is the one pure sacrifice, Christ Himself, the Lamb of God. This cannot be repeated but it can be made present: and it IS made present, amongst all the Gentile nations: a present participation in a timeless sacrifice.

116 posted on 06/20/2015 7:30:00 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (I then said, in a very shaky voice, "Well, if it's a symbol, to hell with it." - Flannery O'Connor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o
Here is the teaching of one more skilled than I to explain:

As for in what manner the body and blood are food, the burden of proof is on those who would claim the saying is literal, because in each passage where it is discussed there is abundant evidence for metaphor.

John 6 for example. In John's Gospel we see that Jesus has repeatedly resorted to metaphors about Himself (Door, Vine, Bread of Life, Way, etc.).  This is necessary because He is a one-of-a-kind experience for those who encounter Him.  Metaphor is precisely what one uses when one wishes to teach about something new and unfamiliar using analogy to something familiar.

In John 6, we are given clue after clue that this too is metaphorical teaching. For just one prominent example, see verse 35:

And Jesus said unto them, I am the bread of life: he that cometh to me shall never hunger; and he that believeth on me shall never thirst.
(John 6:35)
You see here how Jesus satisfies hunger to those who come to Him, thirst to those who believe in Him.  Here you have a perfect example of the classic two-domain comparison that is the hallmark of metaphor.  For example, thirst is a physical primitive, universal to the human experience.  It is the known domain. Believing on Jesus is the unknown domain, something new to human experience.  A metaphor sets up a comparative relationship between these two distinct domains, such that we can learn about the one from the other.  A teaches us about B.

And if you have all that, the human mind automatically looks for the lesson of the metaphor. Romeo says of Juliet that she is lovely as a summer day.  Almost anyone instantly gets what Romeo is saying, that Juliet brings to him a kind of comfort and loveliness we associate with pleasant summer weather, clear blue skies, warming sunlight, a cool breeze, all the richness of it, and all in such a small and elegant passage.  A well chosen metaphor is a powerful way to communicate complex truth.

In John 6, the crowd is stuck on the rumbly in their tummy (to quote Winnie the Pooh).  But Jesus, as steady as a drum, has been directing them to faith in Him, a spiritual exercise. Back in chapter 3 Jesus directs Nicodemas to not look at physical birth, but spiritual.  In chapter 4, Jesus tells the woman at the well to look past the physical location of the temple to the worship that flows from spirit and truth. John 6 is a continuation of that theme.  It drives the whole of John's Gospel.

And here in chapter 6, verse 35 (see above) makes it unmistakable. The subject is food, and so hunger, but hunger that is satisfied by an act of belief in Jesus, in receiving Him as the Messiah, the Son of God.  Clear, unambiguous, elegant metaphor, teaching us the benefits and necessity of faith in Christ.

But the crowd was not disposed to learn that lesson, and cognitive science informs us that when the mind is resistant to the lesson of the metaphor, the metaphor can be misunderstood, just as it was here.

And as if that were not enough, Jesus spells it out in verse 63. He's working in the category of spirit, not flesh.

And at the end of the passage, Peter brings it home one more time.  He doesn't ask Jesus how he may eat His body and so gain eternal life.  He says, to whom else can we go, because you (Jesus) have the words of eternal life, and we do have faith in you as the Messiah, the Son of God.  Peter gets the metaphor.

So the preponderance of the evidence weighs heavily in favor of metaphor, both here and in each of the other relevant passages.  To escape the weight of that evidence, it is you who must come up with a reason why this passage should be understood as describing a form of crypto-cannibalism, in defiance of divine law. Occam's razor, FRiend.  The explanation requiring the least gymnastics that gives a full account of the facts has the better claim to being the truth.  Here, that explanation is metaphor.

Peace,

SR


282 posted on 06/20/2015 7:20:58 PM PDT by Springfield Reformer (Winston Churchill: No Peace Till Victory!)

117 posted on 06/20/2015 7:34:51 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Is it really all relative, Mister Einstein?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: betty boop

You might want to take a look at this twisted explanation, to see if it lines up with your beliefs. I pray that it doesn’t ... eating the blood of Jesus, against the commandment from God in several places in the OT, pleading it fulfills the old covenant or a new one, eating Blood destined to be spread upon the Mercy Set in Heaven for the covering of the law of sin and death, well such an excuse is straight from the brilliant mind of antichrist.


118 posted on 06/20/2015 7:39:07 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Is it really all relative, Mister Einstein?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Springfield Reformer

Lifted your essay. Meant to ping you


119 posted on 06/20/2015 7:39:48 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Is it really all relative, Mister Einstein?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o; MHGinTN

It can only be participation if it were ongoing.

It isn’t.

It is FINISHED (as per Jesus).

And why would anyone think that participating in killing Jesus would be a good thing? Our sin put Jesus on the cross. That’s the only participation in the death of Jesus that we can lay claim to, and that is not the kind of participation that I want any part of any more.

It’s certainly not something I would want to CELEBRATE.


120 posted on 06/20/2015 8:08:16 PM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 281-299 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson