To: kinsman redeemer; Alex Murphy; bkaycee; blue-duncan; boatbums; caww; CynicalBear; daniel1212; ...
Now we'll read the tired (and frequently met) challenge to "Prove 'Sola Scriptura'" and the insistence that everything we need to know is not written... Saying something like "Even scripture leads me to conclude that traditions are justified BECAUSE they're not included in the Bible." Funny. When we are challenged to support sS, we do it.
When Catholics are challenged to support sacred tradition, all we get is ***CRICKETS***.
20 posted on
06/04/2015 10:32:30 AM PDT by
metmom
(...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
To: metmom
Very true...and further catholics require scripture support for what we post...the very thing they claim isn't the ultimate authority. The paradox continues.....
21 posted on
06/04/2015 10:34:49 AM PDT by
caww
To: metmom
When Catholics are challenged to support sacred tradition, all we get is Horsefeathers. I've lost count of the times I've directly supported Catholic doctrine HERE by appealing to Scripture, only to be told solemnly "that's not what those verses mean" ... by people whose own denominations' creedal statements deny the authority of anybody to authoritatively tell a Christian what the Bible does and doesn't mean.
29 posted on
06/04/2015 12:45:29 PM PDT by
Campion
To: metmom
"Funny. When we are challenged to support sS, we do it. When Catholics are challenged to support sacred tradition, all we get is ***CRICKETS***."
Please provide evidence proving both assertions.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson