Indeed. It’s the height of intellectual dishonesty to think that Jesus, those who heard him in person, the authors of the gospels and the other books of the Bible and the original audience those books were initially intended for would’ve thought that marriage was anything but. Of course, in Biblical times there was polygyny(1 man to 2 or more women) but even in that error it still involved the original idea of 1 man to 1 woman.
What liberals have laid on the poor shoulders of Jesus. Oh, how I wish he was here today (in person!) Of course, the libs would crucify him all over again.