Replies

He implied God wasn’t able to do everything. We know no magician can, but why would Francis even imply God can’t either?

Also, why would Francis imply Christ faked anger in the Temple? Or imply that the Blessed Mother felt betrayed at her Son’s Crucifixion?

It seems Francis has no respect for the accuracy of the Bible. Very protestant, if you ask me.

"Imply" "imply" "imply" --- a word you used 3 times in 2 sentences. Your interpretation is very good example of eisegesis. You read into the pope's remarks what you expect to find there. And when he didn't precisely say it, you claim he "implied" it.

Like some (not all) of our polemical non-Catholic brethren and sistren here --- I won't name them because I don't want to ping them into the discussion --- you give the impression of "Papal Worst-ism": the insistence that no matter what he actually said or did, he MUST have meant it in the worst possible way.

45 posted on 05/17/2015 6:47:21 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o ("How do you know I'm mad?" said Alice. "You must be" said the Cat,"or you wouldn't have come here.")