I find it amusing when people attempt to use Latin phrases incorrectly.
If a pope denies the dogma of his own religion, of which he should be very well schooled, of extra eclessium non sullus, why would anybody consider him an expert in “ecology” as you call it?
P.S. The global warming hoax is about a lot more than “ecology”. The Pope’s intimate collaboration with the evil U.N. which is pro-population control via abortion and artificial birth control, all in the name of “protecting God’s creation”, is absolutely despicable.
As for an analysis of what his purported teaching will be in this encyclical, I prefer to wait until it's published and I've read it.
I guess that's considered odd.