Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: stanne; Arthur McGowan
The bad part (back in '68-'70 or so) was that the dissidents continued to organize, agitate, march, run full-page dissenting letters in the NY Times, etc.) and they were not disciplined.

I am just old enough to remember Fr. Charlie Curran leading the CUA theology faculty out on strike in an open defiant protest against Humanae Vitae. IIRC, Cardinal Patrick O'Boyle tried to bring ecclesiastical sanctions against Curran, only to be told to back off by the Vatican!

So they could continue to disobey and obstruct real Catholic docrine, and form their own alternative "Magesterium of the University," and no heads rolled. They continued to stay in the structure of the Church and foment their vile rebellion. They lost on doctrine yet they won the day.

What was it that Tom Bethell wrote about it? Whoever can fill us in on the details (Arthur?) please do so.

4 posted on 05/09/2015 5:01:36 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Fight all error, and do it with good humor, patience, kindness and love. -St. John Cantius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Mrs. Don-o

Geo weighed wrote about it

The Vatican issued humanae vitae. The account of the Vatican siding with dissidents is not quite correct

And the Vatican certainly did not dissent with the very teaching it produced and which it still publishes and teaches. JPII a theology of the body draws on humanae vitae and it is widely accepted in groups obedient with the vatican


7 posted on 05/09/2015 5:17:26 PM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson