Actually, it is the logical result as noted by the USSC and other studies.
>http://www.catholicstand.com/contraception-leads-abortion-come-see/<
“Even the liberals justices on the Supreme Court of the United States (Casey v. Planned Parenthood, 1992) understood clearly that acceptance of contraception requires abortion as a back-up. That Court ruling stated that Roe v. Wade could not be overturned because
…for two decades of economic and social developments, [people] have organized intimate relationships and made choices that define their views of themselves and their places in society, in reliance on the availability of abortion in the event that contraception should fail.”
I don’t agree - not to the extent you are using it - and to the extent that these authors used it - altho mathematically abortion is sometimes the result of failed contraception within marriage. But not very often. It’s kind of like using the “rape or incest” clause to make the case for pro choice - it’s hardly the driving force or the preponderance of cases. Quite the opposite.
And using the Roe V Wade court as back up for your point is hardly helping your argument.