To: ebb tide; Alex Murphy; bkaycee; blue-duncan; boatbums; caww; CynicalBear; daniel1212; Gamecock; ...
Are you guys that big into interpreting each others posts? Do you know what happens when twenty people successively interpret the the originals story? And you all expect us to accept word of mouth or *sacred tradition* which has been passed down for TWO THOUSAND YEARS, on equal footing with transcribed Scripture?
Guess again.....
If you all don't accept it passed down through 20, don't tell us with a straight face that it can pass down over that many years without corruption.
39 posted on
05/01/2015 5:24:24 PM PDT by
metmom
(...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
To: metmom
“Transcribed Scripture”! ROTFLMAO. The Prots have been editing, at will, and “interpreting” Scripture since Luther, the Apostate.
40 posted on
05/01/2015 5:30:00 PM PDT by
ebb tide
To: metmom; ebb tide; Alex Murphy; bkaycee; blue-duncan; boatbums; caww; CynicalBear; daniel1212; ...
A Catholic says don’t trust a story told only twenty times yet trusts stories told through thousands of years? Did I ever mention they are double minded?
148 posted on
05/02/2015 5:47:54 AM PDT by
CynicalBear
(For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus)
To: metmom
And you all expect us to accept word of mouth or *sacred tradition* which has been passed down for TWO THOUSAND YEARS, on equal footing with transcribed Scripture? Indeed. See post here on how Rome "remembered" what it wanted despite lack of early evidence and scholarly conclusions. But as we have been told, historical reality is whatever Rome says it is.
197 posted on
05/02/2015 12:47:04 PM PDT by
daniel1212
(Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson