Posted on 04/22/2015 11:50:07 AM PDT by NYer
Question: I had a former theology teacher at my parishs school tell me that Vatican II changed the Churchs teachings on Adam and Eve and that the first few chapters of Genesis are to be considered as myths. Is that true?
Answer: No, it is not. Below are nine teachings of the Church regarding the first three chapters of Genesis. These teachings can be found in a document which was issued by the Pontifical Biblical Commission, and confirmed by Pope St. Pius X in 1909. These teachings have been the constant teachings of the Church throughout the centuries, and the Pontifical Biblical Commission expounded them in 1909 as a response to the errors of the Modernists that had developed in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. The Modernists were, among other things, denying the reality of Adam and Eve.
Now, you might say, John, this was before Vatican II, the question is: didnt Vatican II change all of this? No, it did not. We can find every single one of these nine teachings of Pope St. Pius X, as expounded by the 1909 Pontifical Biblical Commission, in the Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC) that was published in 1994.
So, here they are, the nine teachings of the Church regarding chapters 1-3 of Genesis, as expounded in the 1909 document from the Pontifical Biblical Commission, followed each time by the paragraphs of the 1994 Catechism that carry the corresponding teachings:
1. The creation of all things out of nothing by God at the beginning of time...and including time; CCC #s 296-299
2. The special creation of man; CCC #s 355-359
3. The creation of woman from man [Eve was created from Adams rib well, the Church doesnt say that it absolutely happened in exactly that way, but it does teach that woman was created from man in some manner]; CCC #371
4. That all of humanity is descended from an original pair of human beings Adam and Eve; CCC #s 54-55, 359-360, 375, 390-392, 402-405, 407, 416-417
5. That Adam and Eve were created in an original state of holiness, justice, and immortality; CCC #s 374-379, 384, 398, 415-416
6. That a Divine Command was laid upon man to prove his obedience to God Thou shalt not eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil - again, exactly what that means, we dont know. Was it really a tree with fruit that they werent supposed to eat? Probably not, but we dont really know. But we do know that there was some command from God, laid upon man, to prove his obedience.]; CCC #s 396-397, 399
7. The transgression of that Divine Command at the instigation of Satan; CCC #s 379, 390-392, 394-395, 397-398, 413-415
8. The loss of the state of holiness, justice, and immortality of our 1st parents, because of their disobedience Adam and Eve were kicked out of Paradise; CCC #s 379, 390, 399-400, 410
9. The promise of a future Redeemer, a Savior Gen 3:15, the protoevangelium, the first good news; CCC #s 410-411
I doubt anyone will contend that the Catechism is pre-Vatican II. So, if the teachings of the 1909 Pontifical Biblical Commission on Adam and Eve are also found in the Catechism of the Catholic Church, then it is obvious that Vatican II did not change the Churchs teachings in regard to Adam and Eve.
Exactly.
Joan Acker H.M., a Humility of Mary sister who has just completed 50 years as an educator..
The jubilee year dawned with the publication of the second U. S. edition of the Catechism of the Catholic Church. Regrettably it continues to treat early Genesis accounts in a Tridentine fundamentalist light, completely avoiding any references to modern biblical exegesis or evolution. Its failure to engage todays religious/scientific culture adequately is an embarrassment both rationally and spiritually. It plays into the hands of scientific creationists and has dangerous ramifications for the future of both science and religion. A uniquely American phenomenon, creation science is bent upon artificially imposing scientific expectations upon the ancient biblical text. Seventy-five years after the Scopes trial in Tennessee, the conflict between creationists and evolution continues in surprisingly innovative ways. Fundamentalism represents anxiety and religious rage over secularizing trends often inaccurately directed against post-Darwinian science. With its simplistic anti-evolution creed, creationism wages a campaign that must not be ignored...
In order to offset creeping fundamentalism, it would be helpful for the new U.S. adult catechism to refresh the faithful about our rescue from biblical literalism by Pius XIIs 1943 encyclical letter Divino Afflante Spiritu, which encouraged scholars to study Scripture in a historical and scientifically critical manner. An American catechism could lead by highlighting the Second Vatican Councils continuing stress on historical critical methods of exegesis in the Dogmatic Constitution on Divine Revelation. Reporting John Paul IIs recognition in 1996 that evolution is more than just a hypothesis would be an important assurance that evolution is a concept loyal Catholics can safely embrace and study. In fact, the latest theology reveals evolution as magnificently unveiling a biblical God of promise who hides divine power to let creation develop on its own built-in terms.
- http://americamagazine.org/issue/392/article/creationism-and-catechism
"To the one we are the savour of death unto death; and to the other the savour of life unto life. And who is sufficient for these things?" (2 Corinthians 2:16)
Thankyou,as always,for the pings dan!
Grace and peace to you brother.
I sure wish Denzinger were online in a searchable format. Wouldn't that be cool?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.