Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: CynicalBear

I see the point still eludes you.

>>>”Scripture is the only infallible source for what the apostles taught.”

And what that means in Christian doctrine is according to you. Are you infallible?

>>”I understand that the Catholic cult doesn’t like scripture alone because it teaches things the apostles obviously didn’t. “

No, first of all because it’s not Scriptural. Second it means Christian doctrine is according to CB and every other individual. It’s results are contrary to Christ’s teaching of one Church, and Paul’s teaching of one Lord, one baptism and one faith.

The problem is not with the source. Get the point yet?


574 posted on 04/15/2015 3:14:43 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 573 | View Replies ]


To: D-fendr

For any argument to have a chance of validity it must first not be inherently contradictory; it must pass it’s own requirements.

Sola Scriptura fails it’s own test. You can argue it’s merits over other methods all you wish, but can never overcome this error.


575 posted on 04/15/2015 3:18:06 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 574 | View Replies ]

To: D-fendr
>>No, first of all because it’s not Scriptural.<<

Oh now that's funny. Catholics don't believe something because it's not scriptural? Since when did Catholics worry about something they believe being in scripture?

576 posted on 04/16/2015 6:25:02 AM PDT by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 574 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson