[CynicalBear]

>>I thought my reply was clear: There's no such thing as scripture only or source only. So your point is moot.<<

No, your reply was not clear. Paul said that anyone who taught something they didn't was to be considered accursed. No Catholic has shown an infallible source for what the apostles taught other than scripture. So unless you can show any other infallible source for what the apostles taught you leave us with nothing but scripture.

[D-fendr]

Paul said that anyone who taught something they didn't was to be considered accursed.

Then you are accursed. Or I am accursed according to you.

No Catholic has shown an infallible source for what the apostles taught other than scripture.

It's the same source. You disagree with the Church on what it says.

Get the point now?