Christ Alone is the Only Way of Salvation

“Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved.” —Acts 4:12

No one can be saved from sin, its guilt, power, and consequences,—excepting by Jesus Christ…No one can have peace with God the Father,—obtain pardon in this world, and escape wrath to come in the next,—excepting through the atonement and mediation of Jesus Christ.

In Christ alone God’s rich provision of salvation for sinners is treasured up: by Christ alone God’s abundant mercies come down from Heaven to earth. Christ’s blood alone, can cleanse us; Christ’s righteousness alone can clothe us; Christ’s merit alone can give us a title to heaven. Jews and Gentiles, learned and unlearned, kings and poor men,—all alike must either be saved by Jesus or lost for ever.

And the Apostle adds emphatically, “There is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved.” There is no other person commissioned, sealed, and appointed by God the Father to be the Saviour of sinners, excepting Christ. The keys of life and death are committed to His hand, and all who would be saved must go to Him.

There was but one place of safety in the day when the flood came upon the earth, and that was Noah’s ark. All other places and devices,—mountains, towers, trees, rafts, boats,—all were alike useless. So also there is but one hiding-place for the sinner who would escape the storm of God’s anger,—he must venture his soul on Christ.

There was but one man to whom the Egyptians could go in the time of famine, when they wanted food,—they must go to Joseph: it was a waste of time to go to any one else. So also there is but One to whom hungering souls must go, if they would not perish for ever,—they must go to Christ.

There was but one word that could save the lives of the Ephraimites in the day when the Gileadites contended with them, and took the fords of Jordan (Judges 12:6),—they must say “Shibboleth,” or die, just so there is but one name that will avail us when we stand at the gate of heaven,—we must name the name of Jesus as our only hope, or be cast away everlastingly.

Such is the doctrine of the text. “No salvation but by Jesus Christ: in Him plenty of salvation,—salvation to the uttermost, salvation for the very chief of sinners;—out of Him no salvation at all.” It is in perfect harmony with our Lord’s own words in St. John: “I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by Me.” (John 14:6) It is the same thing that Paul tells the Corinthians: “Other foundation can no man lay than that is laid, which is Jesus Christ.” (1 Cor. 3:11) And the same that John tells us in his first Epistle: “God hath given to us eternal life, and this life is in His Son. He that hath the Son hath life, and he that hath not the Son of God hath not life.” (1 John 5:12) All these texts come to one and the same point,—No salvation but by Jesus Christ….You are to venture the whole salvation of your soul on Christ, and on Christ only. You are to cast loose completely and entirely from all other hopes and trusts. You are not to rest partly on Christ,—partly on doing all you can,—partly on keeping your church,—partly on receiving the sacrament. In the matter of your justification Christ is to be all. This is the doctrine of the text.

Remember that heaven is before you, and Christ the only door into it; hell beneath you, and Christ alone able to deliver you from it; the devil behind you, and Christ the only refuge from his wrath and accusations; the law against you, and Christ alone able to redeem you; sin weighing you down, and Christ alone able to put it away. This is the doctrine of the text….

….All through the Bible, from Genesis down to Revelation, there is only one simple account of the way in which man must be saved. It is always the same: only for the sake of our Lord Jesus Christ,—through faith; not for our own works and deservings.

You see it dimly revealed at first: it looms through the mist of a few promises, but there it is.

You have it more plainly afterwards: it is taught by the pictures and emblems of the law of Moses, the schoolmaster dispensation.

You have it still more clearly by and by: the Prophets saw in vision many particulars about the Redeemer yet to come.

You have it fully at last, in the sunshine of New Testament history: Christ incarnate,—Christ crucified, —Christ rising again, Christ preached to the world.

But one golden chain runs through the whole volume; no salvation excepting by Jesus Christ. The bruising of the serpent’s head foretold in the day of the fall; the clothing of our first parents with skins, the sacrifices of Noah, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob; the passover, and all the particulars of the Jewish law,—the high priest, altar, the daily offering of the lamb, the holy of holies entered only by blood, the scapegoat, the cities of refuge,—all are so many witnesses to the truth set forth in the text: all preach with one voice, salvation only by Jesus Christ. In fact, this truth appears to me the grand object of the Bible, and all the different parts and portions of the book are meant to pour light upon it. I can gather from it no ideas of pardon and peace with God excepting in connection with this truth. If I could read of one soul in it who was saved without faith in a Saviour, I might perhaps not speak so confidently. But when I see that faith in Christ,—whether a coming Christ or a crucified Christ,—was the prominent feature in the religion of all who went to heaven; when I see Abel owning Christ in his better sacrifice, at one end of the Bible, and the saints in glory in John’s vision rejoicing in Christ, at the other end of the Bible; when I see a man like Cornelius, who was devout, and feared God, and gave alms and prayed, not told that he had done all, and would of course be saved, but ordered to send for Peter, and hear of Christ; when I see all these things I say, I feel bound to believe that the doctrine of the text is the doctrine of the whole Bible. No salvation, no way to heaven, excepting
by Jesus Christ….

….I say calmly that a religion without Christ, a religion that takes away from Christ, a religion that adds anything to Christ, a religion that puts sincerity in the place of Christ,—all are dangerous: all are to be avoided, and all are alike contrary to the doctrine of our text.

You may not like this: I am sorry for it. You think me uncharitable, illiberal, narrow-minded, bigoted, and so forth: be it so….I feel it a duty to bear my solemn testimony against the spirit of the day you live in; to warn you against its infection. It is not Atheism I fear so much, in the present times, as Pantheism. It is not the system which says nothing is true, so much as the system which says everything is true; it is not the system which says there is no Saviour, so much as the system which says there are many saviours and many ways to peace. It is the system which is so liberal that it dares not say anything is false; it is the system which is so charitable that it will allow everything to be true; it is the system which seems ready to honour others as well as our Lord Jesus Christ, class them all together, and hope well of all. Confucius and Zoroaster, Socrates and Mahomet (ie: Mohammed), the Indian Brahmins and the African devil-worshippers, Arius and Pelagius, Ignatius Loyola and Socinus,—all are to be treated respectfully: none are to be condemned. It is the system which bids us smile complacently on all creeds and systems of religion: the Bible and the Koran, the Hindu Vedus and the Persian Zendavesta, the old wives’ fables of Rabbinical writers and the rubbish of Patristic traditions, the Racovian catechism and the thirty-nine Articles, the revelations of Emanuel Swedenborg and the book of Mormon of Joseph Smith,—all are to be listened to: none are to be denounced as lies.

It is the system which is so scrupulous about the feelings of others, that we are never to say they wrong; it is the system which is so liberal that it calls a man a bigot if he dares to say, “I know my views are right.” This is the system, this is the tone of feeling which I fear in this day. This is the system which I desire emphatically to testify against and denounce.

What is it but a bowing down before a great idol specially called liberality? What is it all but a sacrificing of truth upon the altar of a caricature of charity? Beware of it, reader, beware that the rushing stream of public opinion does not carry you away. Beware of it, if you believe the Bible…Has the Lord God spoken to us in the Bible, or has He not? Has He shown us the way of salvation plainly in that Bible, or has He not? Has He declared to us the dangerous state of all out of that way, or has He not? Gird up the loins of your mind, and look these questions fairly in the face, and give them an honest answer. Tell us that there is some other inspired book beside the Bible, and then we shall know what you mean; tell us that the whole Bible is not inspired, and then we shall know where to meet you: but grant for a moment that the Bible, the whole Bible, and nothing but the Bible, is God’s truth., and then I know not in what way you can escape the doctrine of the text. From the liberality which says everybody is right, from the charity which forbids you to say anybody is wrong, from the peace which is bought at the expense of truth,—may the good Lord deliver you!

I speak for myself: I find no resting-place between downright Evangelical Christianity and downright infidelity, whatever others may find. I see no half-way house between them, or houses that are roofless and cannot shelter my weary soul. I can see consistency in an infidel, however much I may pity him; I can see consistency in the full maintenance of Evangelical truth: but as to a middle course between the two,—I cannot see it; and I say so plainly. Let it be called illiberal and uncharitable. I can hear God’s voice nowhere except in the Bible, and I can see no salvation for sinners in the Bible excepting through Jesus Christ. In Him I see abundance: out of Him I see none. And as for those who hold religions in which Christ is not all, whoever they may be, I have a most uncomfortable feeling about their safety. I do not for a moment say that none of them are saved, but I say that those who are saved are saved by their disagreement with their own principles, and in spite of their own system. The man who wrote the famous line,

John 14:6

‘Jesus said to him, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me.’

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=JOHN+14%3A6&version=MEV

You can follow a FReeper, or an apostle of Christ. You have to decide.

You mean there isn't a third choice? I would have hoped there might be another choice, like following Christ. That might be the safest choice. Mom, it looks like you might have a cult following here, just don't let it go to your head. 🙀😼😇

WOW, you were baptized Catholic twice....congratulations!!! (You can't be baptized anything else......and the first one was really enough for all eternity)

There you go mind reading again, thinking you know why I got baptised again. I thought you were not supposed to read minds. 🙈🙉🙉 Actually, I used to be a member of some religion, it has been so long since I dumped it, that I can't even remember what it was called. It was a salvation by works type religion, but now, I joined the the one true church, you know, the 24th New Testament church of the 1933 version of the Idaho ANG of the Lord Jesus, no longer on the cross church. The only true church. I had to renounce my first baptism, as I finally figured out it was meaningless. I am comfortable with that. Sorry that you have to work your way to Heaven. See you at the Pearly Gates, maybe. I will put in a good word for you with St Peter. He always agrees with me anyway. 😟😦😧😇😏😑

You mean there isn't a third choice? I would have hoped there might be another choice, like following Christ. That might be the safest choice.

Didn't you know that Christ said this to His apostles?...

"He who receives you receives Me, and he who receives Me receives Him who sent Me."

And this?...

"And whoever will not receive you nor hear your words, when you depart from that house or city, shake off the dust from your feet. Assuredly, I say to you, it will be more tolerable for the land of Sodom and Gomorrah in the day of judgment than for that city!"

Better to stick with the apostles of Jesus Christ, and leave the followers of men to their own inventions.

As Jesus told His apostles, the preaching of the gospel will sort people into two groups. You must make the decision which group you'll be in.

Jesus said that? Can you show me where? He may very well have said that, but can you show me where it is recorded? I hate to keep sounding like a broken record, but if it's all the same to you, I think I will just follow Jesus.

“...and...”

This is a key point. In defending the the Catholic Churchs correct interpretations of the bible vs. the protestant erroneous interpretations of sacred scripture, again and again it becomes apparent that protestants pick and isolate a verse and then never mention the verses that “appear” to say the opposite. Of course the bible never contradicts itself, so both/and interpretations of the Scriptures are always correct, not whatever (doctrine under discussion) alone and by itself. This is the Catholic Church’s approach.

The Catholic Church’s position ALWAYS incorporates all the scriptures using the both/and applications.

We are entirely scriptural - we just use all scripture, not taking a verse, saying it is scripture alone, interpreting the isolated verse on our own opinion, then conveniently ignoring any verse that appears to say the opposite. This effectively leaves out the scriptures supporting the correct, literal and Catholic meaning of the bible, and then feeling smug, superior and saved regarding the false opinion arrived at!

There is a book out there that addresses the issue; 95 verses that protestants ignore.

At any rate, just posting to let you know that you are on to the root problem here; not just the surface endless posting of scripture.

As you point out, there is always an implied “and”.

1 Corinthians 10
1 For I do not want you to be unaware, brethren, that our fathers were all under the cloud and all passed through the sea;
2 and all were baptized into Moses in the cloud and in the sea;
3 and all ate the same spiritual food;…

I believe that being baptized is much more than merely immersion in water or sprinkled by it. Yet, I have been baptized in the Name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit in a cold mountain river on a November Sunday and am glad for it.

I have been baptized in the Name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit in a cold mountain river on a November Sunday and am glad for it.

A cold stream in November? Double ouch. Mine was in a warm pool in Vietnam. That was, of course, after I left that other religion, that I can't even remember the name of anymore. 😇😬😮😏😑

In defending the the Catholic Churchs correct interpretations of the bible vs. the protestant erroneous interpretations of sacred scripture, again and again it becomes apparent that protestants pick and isolate a verse and then never mention the verses that “appear” to say the opposite. Of course the bible never contradicts itself, so both/and interpretations of the Scriptures are always correct, not whatever (doctrine under discussion) alone and by itself. This is the Catholic Church’s approach.

More accurately, this is your understanding of the Catholic church's approach.

The RCC approach is all over the board (confused and confusing) and is frequently in blatant opposition to the totality of the Holy Bible, the written Word of God.

Just because a FReeper's belief does not correspond to RCC doctrine/teachings, does not necessarily mean he is "feeling smug, superior and saved regarding the false opinion arrived at." Neither does it mean his opinion is false.

I believe that being baptized is much more than merely immersion in water or sprinkled by it.

Yes, it's much more than just getting wet, if that's what you mean. It's an act of obedient faith. It's where the slave to sin is killed and buried, and the free man is raised up (Rom. 6). It's where the saving heart operation is performed by Christ (Col. 2). It's how those whom Christ wishes to be added to His church are cleansed and made presentable (Eph. 5). And so on.

So yes, it's more than just "a dip in the crick". :-)

Without the command of God, would dipping in the Jordan have cleansed Naaman's leprosy (I Kings 5)? Without the command of God, will being immersed in water cleanse our iniquities?

("The washing of water with the word" is critical. For instance, what happens to lepers who dip in the Jordan today?)

A cold stream in November?

The edge of a cold Appalachian river, with rapids, strong currents, and a wind that subsided long enough for all the candidates to be baptized.

A life jacket might have been in order, except that would run counter to the whole idea of death to sin and new life in Christ. Also would have made the dunking more difficult.

O Happy Day!

Ha! Good movie! But no, I was thinking of Huck Finn going swimming.

Sometimes people are baptized “into the Southside Baptist Church” or “into the First Methodist Church of Smallville”, etc. Other people are baptized “as a public demonstration” of sorts.

But is that what you see when you read the Bible? Or do you find people being baptized “into Christ”, “into remission of sins”, etc? Without the instructions from God, does baptism do anything except get you wet?

Let me try to explain with a question: If Naaman had dipped in the Jordan because his clothes were dirty, or because his wife told him he needed a bath, would his leprosy have been cured?

This point is not under contention. How it relates to a Christian wanting to be baptized still is not clear, although I got your message that some folks are baptized primarily to join a local church organization and don't have full understanding of all the ramifications.

Still, are you leading down a rabbit trail unintentionally?

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.