Fair enough. But, no thanks to continue reading. Frankly, the snarky omissions stick out like a sore thumb, so you may wish to check your own “general attitude”.
But, I was simply trying to find out what exactly you are teaching. Apparently, what you do teach is that you unwilling to be clear because that requires “humanly constructed categories”. Then be prepared for some push back to the errors embedded in your posts. Jesus did not spare the Pharisees and Paul did not care for the Judaizers so saccharin sweet, sanctimonious sentimentalism is clearly not biblical Christianity. We’ll call it out when we see it.
Dutch boy please don’t take offense. I don’t know why you think I have engaged in “Snarky omissions”. All I have attempted to do is exposit a text of scripture. IT seems that you are offended because I don’t choose “mono or Syner categories.
I can’t say I am familiar enough with the details of either one, so why should I be force into a box- (similar to Arminian or Calvinism) -
Btw I expect criticism, we all should (James 3:1), I just think as Christians we don’t have to be surly about it. Go ahead and be a Berean, but you don’t have to imply I am a Pelagian, {harisee or Judaizer.