The case is simply this: he is presenting Shari'a law as being some sort of voluntary addition to the Constitution when it is not; it is and proudly proclaims itself supreme. This isn't a case of bigotry or misinterpretation, I'm simply repeating what the imams and the Koran say about the matter. The author is interpreting it as voluntary because it suits his liberal worldview to do so, not because it's the truth. And he views its detractors because it suits his liberal worldview to do so, not because it's the truth. My evidence? Get this:
Fabulously interesting how Jews and evangelical Christians buddy up on these things.
Yes, fabulously interesting. Everybody knows that Jews and evangelical Christians are uniformly bigots, right? That's the liberal worldview I'm talking about. And where it leads is that if the thing ever comes to violence he will absolve himself of any guilt and hide behind his betters, cursing them again when it becomes safe to do so.
Sorry - “views its detractors” should be “views its detractors as bigots”. Poor editing.