Posted on 01/24/2015 3:23:43 PM PST by NYer
But that's what it SAYS.
In what way?
Lots of people do. That's why the term *mother of Jesus* is accurate and *mother of God* is not.
What I puzzle over is: Yashua was born the only sinless person on earth to assume all the sins of mankind. He was the only person who had the Holy Spirit within therefor Mary didn’t have the Holy Spirit. The Bible states: For all have sinned and come short of the glory of God - I don’t want to be contentious but just trying to resolve conflicts.
You would still be in but one single location. You're not in Kentucky and South Carolina.
There is a long historical record of worship of the “Mother Goddess” in human history. Apparently it reaches a need within segments of humanity in their belief systems about the Diety.
So it is not exceptional for the Catholic faith to incorporate this aspect of worship.
In what way?
That's pure fallacy. Christ said He would build His ekklesia. His called out assembly. Nothing about an organized "church".
Yep, I'll agree. Been there done that.
Was the fireman both God and man? Was the fireman two persons in one? Carnal logic does not spiritual understanding make.
Bingo...
And why was it necessary?
The gracious character of this blessing is also the reason that Anne and Joachim did not need to have it: It was a grace God could give to anyone at any time.
If God could do it for Mary, born of sinful parents, then He could have done it for Jesus, born of a sinful mother.
Why not? Sinless is sinless. If Mary was necessarily sinless to bear the sinless Christ, then why was it not necessary for Mary's parents to be sinless to be a fitting vessel to bear the (allegedly) sinless Mary?
Jesus, born on December 25, killed on good Friday and raised on easter Sunday is the counterfeit to the genuine.. that just isn’t truth.. it is false.
It is why Paul didn’t teach the gentiles good Friday or easter Sunday.. he taught passover and first fruits in Corinthians. that was the gospel he taught.
Christianity is based on another gospel, plain and simple..not something people locked in ‘doctrine’ can see..
But just a simple greco roman latin one that has whitewashed the whole Hebrewness..
It isn’t just the words but the theme of Christianity’s gospel that exposes it as a fraud. The only thing that should be Greek, roman or Latin in the new testament should be the words but it isn’t.. it is how Greco Roman Latin holy days dominate christian worship.
Why Santa and the Bunny have a place on two of Christendom holiest days..
Can you explain how the name Joshua got into the new testament? I would like a christian explain that translation work..my concordance has no Joshua listed in the new testament but there they are, two of them..
See Jesus, good Friday and easter is according to Rome..
See Joshua, Passover and First Fruits is according to scripture.. and that scripture could be told from the old testament! Just like Paul did... because we have no proof that the four gospels were even written before Paul began his ministry..
And there is a difference in those two ‘gospels’ as Paul taught vs what Christendom teaches.
You can’t see the difference.. it is why there is something called the ‘mother of harlots’ in scripture.. it isn’t just the mother that is playing the harlot..
And why Christendom doesn’t see itself as any part of Babylon..or a vessel that the enemy has used to steal worship from Genuine Truth..
You will continue to beat up the mother church thinking you will win the debate.. you debate them from their false premise..
Their Jesus is your Jesus.. their Mary is your Mary...
Praise Yah when I knew Him as Jesus, He led me away from all the counterfeits to genuine Truth..
He is willing to do that for any and all..
But it helps to see Rome and her daughters on the same losing side..
That is not done with earthly eyes...
It clumps all of Christendom in with the mother church and her holy city, Rome.
But again, Rome and the world calls today the sun’s day..
Scripture and His calendar calls it His 3rd day..
You and I have had those conversations before..
one is worldly, the other is kingdom based.
Christians may not be ready for His Kingdom to come... they have too much of the world (Rome) on them..
If there comes another calendar on the scene named after Mohammad that the world uses religiously , I will admit I was wrong about Rome..
If not, we still have the pope and his calendar..
His Kingdom that He preached will have zero to do with Greco, roman or Latin worldly influence, unlike what the world follows today..
We can get a head start or we can stay in Babylon until those walls fall.. rahab is the best example of that.. but she wasnt fighting on her Babylon’s side when the walls fell..
I'm not. Some years ago, some Catholics were stating that we are going to be resurrected having the same bodies we have now.
Never mind that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God.
Matthew 7:15 "Watch out for false prophets. They come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves.
Galatians 1:8 But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.
Matthew 24:5 For many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many.
Acts 20:29 - For I know this, that after my departing shall grievous wolves enter in among you, not sparing the flock.
1 John 4:1 - Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world.
Emily is the mother of Sam.
Sam is a fireman.
Emily is the mother of a fireman.
Mary is the mother of Jesus.
Jesus is God.
Mary is the mother of God.
Your *logic* fails.
Mary is the mother of Jesus, GOD WITH US.
Jesus is GOD WITH US. (That’s what His name means)
Therefore Mary is the mother of GOD WITH US.
She is not the mother of the second person of the Trinity.
She’s not the mother of His divine nature, therefore she is NOT the mother of GOD.
Are you saying that Jesus was/is two persons in one?
The Holy Spirit inspired the words “mother of Jesus. He did NOT inspire the words “mother of God”. Do you not trust the words of the Holy Spirit to be reliable? Do you think He forgot to mention “mother of God”? Do you think it wise to go beyond what the Holy Spirit inspired to be written?
So many think they will not have to face death because of their faith.
yep
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.