Umm...you say. Really?
Yes, the source of your assertion would be important, since you are - what, calling her a liar? well-meaning, but misguided? she didn’t experience this hell?
Just because a source is, in your opinion, “Umm, fairly obviously anti-muslim” does not mean the information is not accurate. Though I did give two sources!
But of course there’s
http://islamqa.info/en/158282 which says, in part,
“Praise be to Allaah.
Rape is essentially zina (fornication or adultery) and is proven in the same way as zina is proven, which is with four witnesses.”
But not to worry! It may only require two witnesses, after all - IF...
“If rape is committed using the threat of a weapon or if the woman is abducted forcefully from her home, then it becomes a case of haraabah (banditry or terrorising the people), which is proven with two witnesses only.”
But of course, it is still HER word, her protestation, against HIS.
>>
http://www.amnesty.org/en/news-and-updates/news/child-of%20-13-stoned-to-death-in-somalia-20081031
et al