Let's see now....the Catholic church, which Christ personally founded on the Apostles has, after 1,900 years of examining the facts, listening to some of the most learned people who have ever lived, and utilizing the promise to them that they could NEVER err, proclaim that Mary was born without original sin nor was guilty of serious sin during her lifetime. Then along you come, once basking in the light of Catholicism, now under the influence of a 1933 start up denomination and you tell me that she was a normal sinner. I'm trying real hard to decide which source I'd rather have as a guide to salvation..........O.K., I've decided to stick with Crhist's church....and in this case, I'm very happy that we disagree....
Disagree
the promise to them that they could NEVER err, proclaim that Mary was born without original sin nor was guilty of serious sin during her lifetime
Let me see, three issues there, disagree, disagree, and disagree.
a 1933 start up denomination
Disagree, it is not a denomination. You should do better research, and yes, I DID respect my military buddies.
O.K., I've decided to stick with Christ's church....and in this case, I'm very happy that we disagree....
You do that, and I am also HAPPY we agree to disagree on virtually EVERY issue. See you at the pearly gates. Are you and St Peter going to welcome me in when I get there?
Is that you doing your "private interpretation" thing with proclamations of the RCC? They say not only did Mary not have the stain of original sin, she had NO sin at all, yet here you are "clarifying" that she had no serious sins. Do you mean "mortal" sins? Do you think Mary committed venial sins? For a church that supposedly can NEVER err, they sure do have trouble with deciding what is the current "truth" and catechizing their flock.