I applaud you attempt but none will suffice. Here is a phrase from that declaration. "is possessed of that infallibility with which the Divine Redeemer willed". The word "infallibility" must by definition include perfect "wording" as in without error. It's either infallible or it's not. As a comparison, God didn't say if a prophet was mostly right he was still a prophet. He said if just one of that prophets prophesies was wrong that prophet was not from God.
I don’t think you’re understanding.
I think if you read post 53 it might make more sense?