Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Iscool
Ask yourself this: If Jesus had really meant to "again" and only "again" why didn't He use the word "Palin/ Palon"?

See: Matthew 27:50, Galatians 4:9 (which uses both palon and anthon for different words.). A perfectly good word used numerous times in the New Testament that has one meaning and is not a tertiary meaning.

You have been told the truth, I can do no more, it is now up the Holy Spirit.

256 posted on 11/29/2014 7:33:32 AM PST by verga (You anger Catholics by telling them a lie, you anger protestants by telling them the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies ]


To: verga
Ask yourself this: If Jesus had really meant to "again" and only "again" why didn't He use the word "Palin/ Palon"?

Since Lord Jesus Christ was speaking to Nicodemus in either Hebrew or Aramaic, you would need to ask one of them.

If you look at the words Nicodemus used in reply to Jesus, the full intent of what He was saying was very clear to Nicodumus, who was incredulous at His sayings.

If you don't fight Scripture, Scripture will co-operate with you, but only if the reader/hearer is guided by the one and only true God the Holy Spirit.


262 posted on 11/29/2014 7:51:04 AM PST by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies ]

To: verga
You have been told the truth, I can do no more, it is now up the Holy Spirit.

I believe there's been enough evidence posted to show that you are just barking at the moon...

314 posted on 11/29/2014 1:59:24 PM PST by Iscool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson