Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Mrs. Don-o
That's a fairly coarse way of putting it, Ma'am, and seems somewhat out of character for you.

It's all the more powerful because of its rarity.

59 posted on 11/24/2014 3:04:33 PM PST by NorthMountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: NorthMountain
It is indeed coarse, NM, but I don't know how better to say it, since euphemism only furthers the confusion and aids the Enemy of SOuls.

However, sodomy is just ugly and there's no getting around it. You are repelled by the description because you are presumably a normal and decent person. I recognize that. But saying, for instance, "anal intercourse" is itself misleading, because it makes it seem like an actual kind of intercourse, some sort of parallel with true marital inercourse, which it is not: not even when it involved male and female. It's not even analogous, it's more like a parody. Clinical words don't convey the perverse wretchedness of it all.

It doesn disturb me, though, if I have offended you. Please forgive me.

63 posted on 11/24/2014 3:42:14 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o ("Let us commend ourselves and each other, and all our life unto Christ our God." Liturgy of St.John)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson