Does this mean Chaput is telling Francis and Kasper to cease their promotion of church recognized polygamy (adultery) and for Bruno Forte to cease his promotion of recognizing the “goodness” in homosexual “unions”?
Cardinal Burke, the #1 hoppin-mad opponent of the Synod's weaselly ambiguity, was asked about speculations that Francis would "allow" the recognized remarriage of couples after divorce; he replied that he had no evidence regarding "his [the Pope's] alleged support of a relaxation of the Church's teaching."
Rash judgment is making a judgment on insufficient evidence, on dubious evidence, or against evidence.
You might be tired of hearing this, but I guess I just have to keep repeating it.