Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: kidd
It seems to me that separating the legal element from the ecclesiastical element would be in line with rendering unto Caesar that which is Caesar's and unto God that which is God's. Certainly, this does not fulfill the wish most FReepers have regarding same-sex unions, but it keeps the state out of decisions that properly belong only to churches.
14 posted on 10/28/2014 4:14:09 AM PDT by Pecos (That government governs best which governs least.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Pecos
It seems to me that separating the legal element from the ecclesiastical element would be in line with rendering unto Caesar that which is Caesar's and unto God that which is God's

This works both ways. Kind of difficult to avoid interacting with "Caesar" unless you're completely off the grid. Jesus wasn't advocating living off the grid either...he was cleverly avoiding a trap that questioner was trying to set; establishing how one can live as a Godly person in a government ran by men.

See Post #19.

Without a civil marriage license you have to hope your spouse has a will for themselves, never has to be put on life support, or never commits a crime that you know about.

20 posted on 10/28/2014 5:55:31 AM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson