Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Arthur McGowan
The very eminent canon lawyer Edward Peters has a response to Archbishop Chaput’s proposal:

A well reasoned response. Although I note it does seem to make one big assumption: the continued existence of the State. Perhaps an assumption that can be reasonably held for now. I suppose it's all relative to one's time horizon: five years or 25?

However, If the accelerating downward trajectory of our moral decline is any indications these existential-type questions will require answers sooner rather than later.

That is, unless one is of the belief that we will survive as a state without a moral center.

10 posted on 10/27/2014 11:46:08 PM PDT by JPX2011
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: JPX2011

I think it is unseemly for Chaput to put forth such a melodramatic proposal, when he can’t do what he is OBLIGED to do with respect to pro-abortion/pro-gay-marriage politicians: Refuse them Communion.

I emphasize that I am not saying denying them Communion would be a good idea. I’m saying that giving them Communion is a MORTAL SIN. Which is exactly what Cardinal Burke PROVED to be the case in his famous article: http://tinyurl.com/canon915

Burke mailed a copy of this article to every bishop in the United States. Only about a dozen of them are NOT committing the mortal sin of giving Communion to pro-abortion politicians.


12 posted on 10/28/2014 12:14:18 AM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson