Why does it fall upon this particular Cardinal to concede anything? During investigations and what not the accused as well as all parties to the suit are told to remain silent by the lawyers. There are also privacy of the victims considerations. If it happened to your kid would you want everyone to know about it?
Some ill and disordered people have lied and unjustly made accusations that were not true.
It is also true that just because they ae a Catholic priest does not mean they do not get due process. Does your employer publish the names of people who are disciplined in the newspaper?
But putting all of that aside what do you all suggest we do with homosexual people? Should we hang them? Should we put super glue in their anus as they do in the middle east? I am not really sure why this is used as a club to beat the 98% of Catholics who are innocent of all of this. I am not sure what purpose it serves.
Calling the cardinal a homosexual? Why what evidence is there? Would you prefer he condemn to Hell all of them? Would that make everyone feel better, even though as a mere mortal he has not the power to do that?
Here is a question for all of you, if a priest is a homosexual because he refuses to condemn them and it fact attempts to minister to them, does not by that logic make Jesus a prostitute, drunkard and thief?
The John Jay Report tells us that most of the actual perps were Homosexual males, and that what they were guilty of was not playing with young children but young men who were part puberty. Homosexual behavior.
The John Jay Report tells us that most of the actual perps were Homosexual males, and that what they were guilty of was not playing with young children but young men who were part puberty. Homosexual behavior.