Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Delta 21
Seems to me its all about the mammon.

Not really. The denomination owned the property and the congregation decided to buy it when they left the denomination rather than build a new building.

Churches which outgrow their building sell all the time and move to a larger structure.

22 posted on 09/21/2014 4:32:23 PM PDT by BwanaNdege ("Gang Green and the Government Staff Infection " - Glen Morgan, Freedom Foundation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: BwanaNdege

The denomination owned the property because the deed was turned over as membership fee. The denomination was holding them for ransom.


24 posted on 09/21/2014 4:35:31 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: BwanaNdege
The denomination owned the property and the congregation decided to buy it when they left the denomination

Wrong. The building was paid for by the members and titled in the local church. About 30 years ago, when its denomination merged into the northern church, a clause was added to the denomination's rules which said that the local congregation held the property in trust for the denomination. Highland Park claimed that no trust was established under Texas law (although it could be argued that they did, in fact accede to the the clause when they voted against leaving in the early 1990s after the merger but before the clause became binding.

30 posted on 09/21/2014 4:49:11 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson