Posted on 09/21/2014 4:17:55 PM PDT by Gamecock
From the Hegemony section:
..."This bloc(the hegemonic super-structure he refers to) forms the basis of consent to a certain social order, which produces and re-produces the hegemony of the dominant class through a nexus of institutions, social relations, and ideas. In this manner, Gramsci developed a theory that emphasized the importance of the political and ideological superstructure...
I hate to say this, but Gramsci was pretty sharp. His writings were analytical and general, but he was and remains the left's go-to guy for explaining the fact that nobody in the post-WWII West cares for communism. The ideal is that the "masses" did not understand their oppression because it surrounded them; somebody made the analogy of a fish in water, the fish has no conception of water though it's all around him.
I'm not sure Gramsci subscribed the strategy of infiltrating and subverting these "hegemonic institutions" from within, but it has become the left's preferred strategy--no truncheons or tear gas, a fine salary, and perks to boot. Besides, they figure the proletariat is dumb and doesn't care for these insights.
Note to all millionaires and billionaires: spend every penny of your money, and do not create some foundation or benevolent trust. They'll get it. Seriously though, we should study these guys--two can play the game.
The don’t owe anything to stop being members. They negotiated a settlement to keep the building and remove the claim that the deed was held in trust for PCUSA.
No that is not quite correct. We actually we attended HPPC at that time of the vote and split. A majority voted to leave PCUSA, but it needed a supermajority (something like 66% or 75%, don’t remember exactly) to actually leave. So it was really unfortunate in that even though a majority wanted to leave PCUSA, we couldn’t because didn’t have quite enough.
Don’t make this crabby old Calvinist come over there! ;-)
Large PCUS church in Tulsa had to cough up a lot of dough to keep its property. The courts seem to side with the denomination.
For those who are interested, there are Presbyterian churches that are true to God’s Word. The Orthodox Presbyterian church was founded in the late thirties when the mainline Presbyterian church started straying, and the Presbyterian Church in America was founded in 1973. There are some other ones, as well.
So it is no surprise that PCUSA went further left; hard left.
Those millionaires and billionaires can hire an army of lawyers to keep them at bay...for at least a while.
I ALSO didn't know that "Officials" there who made the tough choice had to face a $8.89 million cost for the churchs property and membership fees.
I suppose we shouldn't be surprised that money plays such a prominent part of their national congregation. LOVE OF money plays a prominent part of MANY people's lives, regardless of faith or nationality.
No, this is why congregations should RENT. I've lost track of the number of cases I've read, where Leftists invade and take over a congregation for the purpose of seizing the assets. If the property is either rented, or heavily mortgaged, so that the only thing keeping it afloat is the weekly contributions of the congregation, then there is nothing for Leftists to covet.
They don't "do" Apostolic Tradition and the Papacy. That was their choice in the 16th century.
Ironically, this is the only non-Catholic church I have ever attended. We went when visiting friends in Dallas 3 years ago.
Money well spent.
Parents stop talking about communism to their kids. Same goes for religion too. People became glued to the tv at dinner time and stopped talking to each other at the dinner table.
Then there's the break up of the family.... The masses don't understand anything because tv and entertainment became the parent/god/friend of the modern family.
I agree actually. I had this strange dream and the church was in an empty store-front owned by one of the members and the pastor had a full time job elsewhere. The church didn’t have to worry about losing any tax status because it didn’t have one, the pastor could talk politics and endorse candidates if he wanted. Legally it was just a bunch of people gathering to worship, and there was no actual organization for the leftist orgs to sue.
The original reasons for denominations owning property were good reasons. (1) It prevented takeover specialists from flooding churches with their own people and essentially stealing the property by getting into voting positions and voting it to themselves. (2) It prevented easy departure for piddling reasons.
As always, the problem with any hierarchy is that it, too, must remain faithful. If the leadership is lost, then the church will be steered in a sinful direction.
The problem for the future is that these churches will now have to vest the property in their own trustees, and these can become corrupt over time also.
I think the best answer might be for churches to rent properties rather than own them.
“The document cited a 2011 survey of pastors in the denomination who were asked for their level of agreement with the following statement: Only followers of Jesus Christ can be saved.”
So those who have never heard of Jesus are condemned to Hell?
That’s what Romans 1 indicates.
That would not be the God I worship.
Actually, I think that compared to other PCUSA churches, HP got a bargain. Here in Atlanta, churches that are interested in leaving with their property are being told much higher sums — some in the $50 million range. It is stifling the exodus here. This process of leaving varies greatly from presbytery to presbytery and state to state.
My former home church in Houston just had their vote to leave and was a couple dozen votes shy of the 2/3rds necessary. Irregularities were found with enough ballots to be questionable, but another vote was not allowed.
So who then goes to Heaven and based on Scripture, why?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.