Safe harbors? There are plenty of places to find those. FR ought to be robust and candid, within limits of course. Those who are ill equipped to defend themselves in discussion have my sympathy.
There are plenty of web sites where co-coreligionists can discuss their particular issues. Maybe that was not the case in 1990 but it is certainly the case now.
I have no idea what FR thinks they are doing with these caucus threads.
“There are plenty of places to find those. FR ought to be robust and candid, within limits of course.”
It is the owner’s rules, and I find them reasonable. Not everyone wants to debate their religious beliefs.