Posted on 08/15/2014 8:15:57 AM PDT by NKP_Vet
Bill Donohue comments on the Vatican's response to the Islamic State terrorists:
The Catholic Church's just-war doctrine allows for a military response to grave conflicts, provided that several criteria are operative. The Vatican has made it clear that the mass murder being committed by Islamic State terrorists meets that standard.
No one has been more pointed than Archbishop Silvano Tomasi, the Holy See's Permanent Observer to the United Nations. He said this week that "there might be occasions in the life and in the relations between states when dialogue, negotiations, fail and large numbers of people find themselves at risk: at risk of genocide, at risk of having their fundamental, their basic rights violated."
"In this case," Tomasi said, "when every other means has been attempted, article 42 of the Charter of the United Nations becomes possible justification for not only imposing sanctions of economic nature on the state or the group or the region that violates the basic human rights of people, but also to use force. All the force that is necessary to stop this evil and this tragedy."
The Pontifical Council for Interreligious Dialogue also released a statement calling on "religious leaders, especially Muslims," to condemn the genocide. It cited "The execrable practice of beheading, crucifixion, and hanging of corpses in public places"; "The choice imposed on Christians and Yezidis between conversion to Islam, payment of tribute or exodus"; "The imposition of the barbaric practice of infibulation" [female genital mutilation]; "The forced occupation or desecration of churches and monasteries"; and "The destruction of places of worship and Christian and Muslim burial places." It also made it plain that "No cause can justify such barbarity and certainly not a religion."
Kudos to the Vatican. It is speaking with greater clarity and urgency than our golf-vacationing president.
My criticism of the hierarchy on this point is not hatred of the Church. Rather, it is to call them back to the true teaching of the Church, which is that using the necessary violence to defend oneself or the innocent is not only justified, but at times obligatory.
You can't deny that there has been an awful lot of ambiguity coming from Rome these days where there should be clarity.
So no use of fragmentary weapons? By this definition you couldn't shoot bullets lest they hit a non-combatant. Bayonets and swords. Stupid idea that sounds good until the details are revealed.
“Rather, it is to call them back to the true teaching of the Church, which is that using the necessary violence to defend oneself or the innocent is not only justified, but at times obligatory”.
I agree. But very few wars meet Just War guidelines. Agreeing that the slaughter of Christians in Iraq is wrong and using force to stop it has nothing to do with the Just War Theory. It’s common sense.
How many army divisions, aircraft wings, and warships does the Vatican have? Can Pope Francis do a public relations release to be more specific? I haven seen the Vatican’s Table of Organization and Equipment (TO&E) for its armed forces.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.