Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: steve86

Because a Bishop is the head of a diocese, not just one parish. The Bishop is sovereign in his diocese, and is able to exercise prudential judgement.

The Pope is sovereign in the diocese of Rome, and Vatican City. The Church is the laity, in conjunction with Bishops, supporting the Pope. The Bishops, in union with the Pope, provide authoritative teaching, guidance, and direction to their dioceses.

Thus, there may be an issue in one diocese, but not another, and is best handled by the local ordinary.

So, no, this isn’t a leadership issue, nor an apologetic for the Pope. Rather, it is the explanation of how leadership is exercised at the appropriate level of organization.


18 posted on 06/24/2014 5:30:17 PM PDT by SpirituTuo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: SpirituTuo

Since the mid-60s, seems to be a failed model.


19 posted on 06/24/2014 5:40:23 PM PDT by steve86 ( Acerbic by nature, not nurture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson