“If you meant something different you should have written something different.”
One typo does not negate a consistent argument made across multiple posts on a single thread. No sane person would think I was arguing priests are inherently superior to married men as marriage counselors, since that was the argument of the article that I was taking issue with. Further, your reply made it clear you understood my point as I intended, since you quoted my sentence:
“Really? Someone who is not married is superior in discussing marriage to a married counselor?”
In response you wrote, “Really is it now a requirement that ALL marriage counselors be married? When did this law pass? Is it just for your state or all states?”
That is not, in any way or in any post, what I said. You constructed a straw man to attack and pretended I was arguing that marriage counselors MUST be married. You knew what I wrote, and you deliberately argued about something I NEVER wrote. I’ll let others determine the truthfulness of your response.
I quoted you word for word. And as I said: “If you meant something different you should have written something different.”