>> “Some prominent creationist promoters of these tracks have long since withdrawn their support. Some of the allegedly human tracks may be artefacts of erosion of dinosaur tracks obscuring the claw marks. There is a need for properly documented research on the tracks before we would use them to argue the coexistence of humans and dinosaurs.” <<
.
Ignorant claptrap.
Carl Baugh had a detailed compression analysis done over 30 years ago on the foot prints that conclusively proved them to be human prints. Only a deliberate deceiver would try to say otherwise.
I will swear to those observations in any court of law.
I felt the fresh chisel marks in the (muddy-water-filled, 3' above an nearly dry river -- in a drought) newly-carved "man track" on the WRONG side of that flipped slab. And it was my F-I-L's pocketknife I borrowed to demonstrate to him that the largest "Giant Man Track" was actually carved in MUD. I stuck it in to the full depth of its longest blade -- before I carved my "X" across the abomination.
By the way, guess whose name was on that "Bauanthropus" plaque?
I know who the "deliberate deceiver" really is. And I know who has made his shameful, scamful living off of that phony museum.
And -- I am a Christian, who believes devoutly in our Creator and His Creation.