I should have summarized, in answer to your question, that I think the article has the balance; if anyone takes part without the other, that would be an unbalance.
As for DeMontfort, I think one can take him to a quite unbalanced place; and, reading him one, usually, needs a guide. I think this one helps:
http://www.ncregister.com/blog/mark-shea/a-reader-s
“None of this is dogmatic, but it is in accord with the implications of the Tradition. “.
In other words take it or leave it but either is OK. Also it built not from scripture nor from traditions but it is implied from tradition.