I am not trying to win a debate ... I contend with you only because so many people read these forums ... the vast majority here understand that your theological method leads to aberrant conclusions ... but there may be some who would be captured by your empty deception (Col. 2:10), so in the spirit of 'refuting those who contradict' (Titus 1:9) ... I await your next article from wherever you get them.
After all, how can one defend a doctrine that has no biblical foundation, such as yours?
Is that some kind of incantation? Are you trying to change reality by confessing it is so?
You may as well cast aspersions, since that is all you seem to do well.
BTW, who is the Antichrist this month? Are you a member of Hal Lindsey’s Antichrist of the Month Book Club? If not, how do you keep current? -:)
Do you even read what you write?
I see: your intent has been to smear and redirect all along. I suspected that was the case.
>>>I contend with you only because so many people read these forums ... the vast majority here understand that your theological method leads to aberrant conclusions.<<<
So, everyone should follow the herd? Have you been taking lessons from Al Gore?
Why not be up front with everyone and explain why you object to my doctrine? You have proven you are a comedian (or, at least, you understand baseball, somewhat;) but you have yet to point out in the scriptures where I am wrong. The reason you have not is because you can not!
>>>but there may be some who would be captured by your empty deception (Col. 2:10), so in the spirit of 'refuting those who contradict' (Titus 1:9) ...<<<
Sure. And suppose you tell us who created your false doctrine, and when? And while you are at it, why not explain what you mean by the general statements of Col 2:10, and Titus 1:9. It is one thing to cite scripture. It is another thing to show how it relates. Certainly you can do more than resort to smears and innuendo?
>>>I await your next article from wherever you get them.<<<
You await it? With what, another baseball joke?
Since you brought it up, when are you going to post more articles from Mr. Congenial, Arnold G. Fruchtenbaum? LOL! What a joke he is. I can't believe anyone would label him "congenial?" Barely eight pages into his smear (disguised as a scholarly paper) against anyone who believes in the plain words of Hebrews 8:13, he was throwing the anti-semite label at Reformed Presbyterian legend, Oswald T Allis. "Brother Fruchtenbaum" is just another Pharisee.
You do know that your buddy, the false prophet Hal Lindsey, also does that a lot: smears Reformed Presbyterians with the anti-semite label. "Brother Hal" is even on record as labelling a popular Reformed Presbyterian minister as the anti-Christ! LOL! People do not get any crazier than Hal Lindsey.
Admit it, Dartuser: there are no congenial dispensationalistists! They must resort to smears and innuendo, like Fruchtenbaum and Lindsey do (and like you do,) since their arguments are not biblically founded.
And how about some articles from the false prophet (and lousy "historian,") Mark Hitchcock?
>>>Is that some kind of incantation? Are you trying to change reality by confessing it is so?<<<
More redirection? When are you going to dispute my five points in post #19? Or, are you going to give to give us another baseball joke? Certainly you can show us the error of my ways in at least one of the points? You are a scholar, right?
Dartuser . . . it is becoming impossible to take you seriously . . .
Philip