Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: CTrent1564

“There was a Roman Catholic Church in 200 AD.”

No. There was not a church that taught what the Roman Catholic Church teaches. Even past 400 AD, the “Pope” was not thought of as Pope. Shoot, arguably the Orthodox have the real claim to continuity, with the Roman Catholics breaking off to follow their earthly leader.


44 posted on 05/18/2014 1:18:08 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (I sooooo miss America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: Mr Rogers; CTrent1564
No. There was not a church that taught what the Roman Catholic Church teaches. Even past 400 AD, the “Pope” was not thought of as Pope. Shoot, arguably the Orthodox have the real claim to continuity, with the Roman Catholics breaking off to follow their earthly leader.

The first pope didn't show up until around 600 AD...They didn't even know what a pope was until then...There was no single bishop in charge of all the churches...Many bishops existed...

There is no successor for Peter in the scriptures while there are successors for the apostle Paul...Peter's ministry kind of went by the wayside as far as bible history goes...

49 posted on 05/18/2014 1:36:38 PM PDT by Iscool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: Mr Rogers

Mr. Rogers:

Really? Yes, they had churches teaching what the First this Baptist, Pentecostal Church of somewhere in Miisssssss sippppi or Allaaaaaabammma , or Tennnnnnesseeeeee

Yea right


63 posted on 05/18/2014 3:37:27 PM PDT by CTrent1564
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson