Worthy receivers, outwardly partaking of the visible elements, in this sacrament, do then also, inwardly by faith, really and indeed, yet not carnally and corporally but spiritually, receive, and feed upon, Christ crucified, and all benefits of his death: the body and blood of Christ being then, not corporally or carnally, in, with, or under the bread and wine; yet, as really, but spiritually, present to the faith of believers in that ordinance, as the elements themselves are to their outward senses.No idea what precisely is meant by "spiritually present," or whether they would consider this the same as "real presence."
From Bromlow's exposition on Westminster:
"This paragraph, in order to be properly understood, must be read in the context in which it was written. This article is simultaneously and intermittently avoiding two fallacies: first (the Zwinglian), ignoring Christs real, bodily, supernatural presence in the Lords Supper; and second (the Lutheran), confusing the manner in which his body and its benefits are communicated to us in the Lords Supper. This article then affirms completely that Christ is really, bodily present in the Lords Supper and that when we receive it worthily, we truly feed on his physical, glorified body and blood. It also affirms that the manner in which the body and blood of Christ and its benefits are communicated to us is not through some physical means as the Lutherans claim (that in the elements, that which is symbolized is actually contained: the universally present, but localized, invisible body of Christ) but through the powerful ministry of the Holy Spirit."
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/2024925/posts