You are the Preterist-Postmill combo, I can’t imagine a worse eschatology, your posts are no more than sophistry in my view, I don’t pay any attention to what you’ve got to say, quite frankly. Consider the source.
As to myself, I am historic premill, I am not dispensationalist.
Re: the Ligonier site, I went to its link in the lead article, first time there, when I saw the site featuring R. C. Sproul, which everybody knows is a prterist, I read no further, I assume Mathison is probably preterist. The site likewise.
What I said about preterists being sneaky, in my personal experiences with them I’ve found to be true. It is like getting blood out of a turnip getting them to admit that is what they are.
Why not? You seem to be able to imagine everything else. All dispensational/futurist prophecy is based on vivid imaginations. If you don't believe that, you have not been following the Antichrist-of-the Month Book Club. LOL!
BTW, who is the Antichrist this month? LOL!
>>>your posts are no more than sophistry in my view<<<
At least they are not sour grapes. Would you care to post scripture supporting your unsubstantiated claims; or are you going to continue to cast aspersions, hoping the naive will fail to see through your deceptions?
>>> I don’t pay any attention to what you’ve got to say, quite frankly. Consider the source.<<<
It appears you have been paying quite a bit of attention!
>>>As to myself, I am historic premill, I am not dispensationalist.<<<
Not historic enough. I see you failed to challenge my quotes from Eusebius. Of course, you cannot; but I assumed you would at least try.
>>>Re: the Ligonier site, I went to its link in the lead article, first time there, when I saw the site featuring R. C. Sproul, which everybody knows is a prterist, I read no further, I assume Mathison is probably preterist. The site likewise.<<<
That is typical of dispensational/futurist hysterics. Dr. Mathison is a postmillennialist. And there are no preterists on the site: at least not in the narrow-minded way you define a preterist. Everyone check out Mathison's book, Postmillennialism: An Eschatology of Hope, (Phillipsburg: P&R Publishing, 1999.) Find out what the doom-and-gloomers don't tell you (e.g., "the rest of the story.") LOL!
>>>What I said about preterists being sneaky, in my personal experiences with them I’ve found to be true. It is like getting blood out of a turnip getting them to admit that is what they are.<<<
That is deceptive. Many postmillennialsts also claim to be partial preterists; for example, Ken Gentry. The reason they, like I, tend to avoid discussing "labels" with futurists is explained by the hysterical, unscholarly tirade you presented. They don't have the time or the patience for such antics.
When are you going to defend your doctrine with some scripture? You know your slanders will no longer work on this thread now that you have been challenged and exposed?
Philip