Thank you so much for sharing your insights, dear brother in Christ!
I would say line by line and precept by precept, for there is a lot of that.
Yet short of that (or thinking some thing as approaching "infallibility") if there be some error somewhere...I have to admit to being a bit tired and my eyes glazing over so not seeing anything apparently unreasonable/unfounded.
I could provide some further expansion on a few of his points offered in refutation to the "claims" he was opposing, but for now, won't. If that makes somebody out there happy-- send a few bucks to the freepathon? hehheheh. dialing for dollars is trying to find me
Many single sentences (of dan's) pack quite a theological punch.
As with all the rest, to understand what the man is saying would take some time for those not well acquainted with the theology and apologetic concerning differing views-- which dan does cover quite thoroughly.
I understand why too, for most all of what he speaks of is inexorably interlocked, one thing after another...line by line.
There is a reason replies can run so long, along with there having been statements made by a few various persons(?) offered refutation towards, all in the same reply.
Bless the Lord.