Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: BlueDragon

Your first post to me on this thread was:

Do what in memory of Him? “This do” in memory of Him. (1) Gotta’ problem with that?

And so on around and around.

It’s not that I don’t like the answers; I don’t see the answers.

>>>I have answered that question in extensive detail. See -”discernment of the body”.

We are to consume the discernment of the body?

That’s nonsensical.

And the whole “fisherman” tangent is not even a tangent, it’s out there in off topic land. Why not stick to a coherent argument?

Why is it so hard to answer simply: “Consume what?”


143 posted on 04/17/2014 3:14:37 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]


To: D-fendr

Asked and answered.

Is it so hard (for you) to recall what has been said, or do you stumble at what it means?

Otherwise, this continuance is just more of your own obvious dodge to answer any questions, yourself?

The answer is as you would say, "obvious".

Goodbye


144 posted on 04/17/2014 3:29:55 PM PDT by BlueDragon (A ship in the harbor is safe, but that is not what ships are for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson