“But I think that was unwise. The Catholic Church should, I think, return to the traditional strictness over miracles as validating a person’s arrival in heaven. Because how could we know that, unless God gave us a sign? Let God make the call. It’s His job! “
I have to disagree here. No one can even know if the so-called miracle was attributable to that particular person. A human has to decide, yup! it was them.
There are serious problems with this.
First, they aren’t real miracles the person did. Peter’s shadow fell on people and they were healed. Everyone saw it. It is recorded in inspired Scripture.
Contrast that to an ignorant person who prays to a departed pope:
1. Scripture never indicates Christians are ever to pray to a person or angel
2. Scripture never indicates a departed person can hear them
3. Scripture never indicates the ignorant prayer’s prayer ever got to God
4. There is no way to confirm the departed person even went to heaven
5. There is no human way to confirm the departed person had a role at all in the so-called miracle.
6. In the end, you have a human opinion that is influenced by their desire to categorically state a departed person was indeed a saint.
Now, on to your earlier point.
Virtually everyone, regardless of denomination, assumes their departed friend or family member has gone to heaven (”a better place”). It is a shame, but they do it because it is comforting. The opposite thought is unthinkable to them.
However, the requirement to have eternal life in God’s presence is to entrust ourselves to Him for salvation, based entirely on His sacrifice and not our own efforts or merit. If we do this, surely His new life will manifest itself in a changed life marked by good works.
We are right to take God at His Word in this instance.
Kindest regards to you...
Thank you. Kind regards to you, too!