Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: OneVike
This is an incorrect interpretation of the ringwoodite discovery. There is not liquid water down there. It's hydrated silicate rock. Again, not liquid water.

If God wants a "fountain of the great deep", he will make one. There is no need for there to be an ocean under the crust.

People need to read the source papers before agreeing to stuff like this.

14 posted on 04/08/2014 4:00:57 PM PDT by backwoods-engineer (Blog: www.BackwoodsEngineer.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: backwoods-engineer
If God wants a "fountain of the great deep", he will make one.

And if he wanted to get rid of all the unclean animals and all but a handful of people, they'd just be gone.

28 posted on 04/09/2014 6:32:15 AM PDT by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: backwoods-engineer

Let me try this again - in post #15 you claim:

“This is an incorrect interpretation of the ringwoodite discovery. There is not liquid water down there. It’s hydrated silicate rock. Again, not liquid water.
If God wants a “fountain of the great deep”, he will make one. There is no need for there to be an ocean under the crust.”

I simply tried to tell you that you are wrong - deeper than these hydrated silicates - God did make these fountains, they did erupt and modern day scientists continually mis-read the signs left from a global flood.

Dr. Walt Brown documented in creationscience.com the research finings of 5-7 mile deep clean large water pools [remnants of the fountains of the great deep] - possibly still meeting or exceeding the quantities in the oceans.


40 posted on 04/10/2014 6:26:56 AM PDT by BrandtMichaels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson