This thread is not about individual Freepers, it is not "about" you.
I specifically did not mention names, which I had addressed in a previous post to you and Jim.
This is about a person on this forum who said I was dishonest for just repeating what I heard from multiple protestants.
and my post was specifically in response to daniel’s crack.
But the fact at issue is still in contention, now how do I address the specifics of the contention to be RM safe?
So I get called dishonest for repeating what I have been told by protestants,
and then I can’t respond to daniel’s claim of “more contrived Catholic polemics”
my response was not contrived,
I did respond to directly to his objection and
I did not mention the original posters name as I had asked you earlier
Now exactly what did I do wrong
and exactly how do I respond to get it to “fly”