Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: LurkingSince'98; Alex Murphy; Alamo-Girl; metmom; boatbums; caww; presently no screen name; ...
Examination of claims of Scripture use in the RC Mass, pt. 1.

This is your typical run of the mill Catholic Mass - the whole thing, with all the Scripture chapter and verse:

This is incredible. The fact is that unlike your “Catholic Mass Scripture” special work that you provided as an example of scripture is a Catholic mass, the missal does not provide all these Scripture references. And hardly any of them are direct quotes, less alone actually supporting what they are referenced for! Thus based on your "rules" and example it would be even easier to present a Prot service that has more scripture than a Catholic mass based upon all that a Scripture reference can be given for — even “Amen” as in your Mass!

So this is what you mean by "Catholic masses do have more scripture than protestant services?!" I presumed this meant actual quotes or actual reading of Scripture, not everything you can throw a reference at! But that measure we could give Scripture references for far more in a Prot. sermon then what is actually quoted. As said as the close of this, Did you really think that any Protestant claim that the Mass had less Scripture was referring to how many things one can give references for, valid or not! Absurd!!! Any such claim refers to how much of Scripture is read and exposited in a comprehensive manner. In evangelical churches, which you never even attended, the preacher preaches from Scripture with the congregates having their Bible open to read what he reads and examine it thereby. Now you know what “contrived is a fitting word to describe your contest. At the least, this further evidences your lack of consideration of what your challenge entails.

"...what king, going to make war against another king, sitteth not down first, and consulteth whether he be able..." (Luke 14:31) Your contest evidences such a lack of consideration as to make it meaningless.

Now lets go thru your list of the use of Scripture, eand also look at the validity of their use,, ven though RCs do not even see these references in their missal (Scriptural substantiation e not being the basis for assurance.)

In the Name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit. (Matt. 28:19)

An actual text, though no NT pastors was ever titled "priest" (hiereus) nor does presbuteros (elder) mean that, but which is a case of imposed functional equivalence, while "priesthood as we know it in the Catholic church was unheard of during the first generation of Christianity, because at that time priesthood was still associated with animal sacrifices in both the Jewish and pagan religions." "When the Eucharist came to be regarded as a sacrifice [after Rome's theology], the role of the bishop took on a priestly dimension. By the third century bishops were considered priests.." - Catholic writer Greg Dues in “Catholic Customs & Traditions , a popular guide”

People: Amen (1 Chr 16:36)

"Amen" counts as use of Scripture! As you allow that most Protestant ` services are not liturgical, then what occurs during a service should be allowed as constituting containing Scripture, included "Amen." Amen, or do more rules follow?

Priest: The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ and the love of God and the communion of the Holy Spirit be with you all. (2 Cor 13:13)

An actual text, but which is heard every week, and does not constitute usage that promotes Biblical literacy, and which the the charge against the Mass as not having much Scripture refers to. But you are acting according the letter of such.

Nether of these are Scripture quotes, but the references simply are given in support, with the latter (James 3:6: “the tongue is a fire....”) not even referring to thoughts. Thus your criteria not only allows for what may be given a Scripture reference for, but even if the latter does not refer to it.

Not an actual text, and which also further examples the loose nature of what a Scripture reference can refer to. Romans 12:16 states: Be of the same mind one toward another. Mind not high things, but condescend to men of low estate. Be not wise in your own conceits.

Fitting references would have been 2Cor. 5:10 and James. 4:17

1Thess 5:25 simply says “Brethren, pray for us,” and is not directed to Heaven but those on earth, and despite over 200 prayers to Heaven in Scripture, not one examples or teaches prayer to anyone else in Heaven but the Lord. Extrapolating an equivalence of ability between earthly relationships and earth to heaven relationships is invalid, as it requires created beings to posses attributes of Deity which only God is shown as having (hearing from Heaven incessant mental prayers from earth addressed to them beseeching favor, and responding.)

Not an actual text, and support forgiveness without a clerical priest.

More substantial evidence of the great use of Scripture in Mass!

The former says “pray that God would have pity on us” but is from a book (Tobit) that is a spurious fantastic tale about a women, Sarah, who has lost seven husbands because Asmodeus, the demon of lust, and ‘the worst of demons’, abducts and kills every man she marries on their wedding night before the marriage can be consummated!

And about a man, Tobias, who was sleeping with his eyes open while birds dropped dung into in his eyes (sound sleeper!) and blinded him. And who later is attacked by a fish leaping out of the river to devour him! But Raphael has him capture it and later he burns the fish’s liver and heart to drive away the demon Asmodeus away to Upper Egypt, enabling him and Sarah to consummate his marriage!

The latter (1 Tim 1:2) is not an actual quote, but says, “Grace, mercy, and peace, from God, and our Father and Jesus Christ our Lord.”

An actual quote, but as with the others, it is an added reference for a weekly redundant liturgy which fosters perfunctory professions.

Not an actual quote, but is of correspondent angelic praise.

Not an actual quote, but correspondent as “Alleluia: for the Lord God omnipotent reigneth.”

Not actual quotes, but correspondent.

Not an actual quote, and was not an actual request (who is even at the right hand of God, who also maketh intercession for us.)

Partly an actual quote, if said by demons. Out of 40 places “the Holy One” occurs, they pick this! But as often with the catechism, it appears Scripture texts are carelessly added for support after the doctrine is written, not as actually based upon it.

Not an actual quote, and the texts states “Son of the Highest: and the Lord God shall give unto him the throne of his father David.”

Far from an actual quote, and simply supports that there is a Father, Son and Spirit.

Two actual verses.

Not actual quotes, and the former says “possessor of heaven and earth” and the latter refers to Christ as being how all was created. It would have been easy to find texts that say God is the creator of all (Gn. 2:1; Rv. 4:11) but again, poor or careless invocations of Scripture abound in Rome.

Not an actual quote: “that holy thing which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of God.” Jn. 3:16 or Heb. 1:5 would provide more direct support.

Not an actual quote, but the text is supportive as would Jn. 8:42.

Close enough.

Not an actual quote, but supportive, if again, heard every week.

Not an actual quote, but repetitively supportive.

Likewise not an actual quote, and does not mention Pilate. Mk. 15:15 would be more fitting.

Not an actual quote, but supportive.

Likewise.

Likewise.

Likewise, but does not mention coming again in glory, as Mt. 16:27 does.

Close enough.

Again not an actual quote, and far from it. Does not mention Lord, or directly as giving life. 2Cor. 3:17 says “the Lord is that Spirit and Job. 33:4 says “The Spirit of God hath made me, and the breath of the Almighty hath given me life.” The Holy Spirit and Jesus are God in nature but positionally Christ is made Lord till all His enemies are under His feet. (1Cor. 15:24-28)

Along with Jn. 15:26, from the Father through the Son, but Rome seems afraid of giving more than one book reference and placing too much prominent weight on Scripture. This from the Father versus from both was an issue that served as a reason for the EOs split.

Again not an actual quote, and does not mention corporately being an object of worship, though assumed.

Again not an actual quote, and only directly supports the church being a mystical body of believers.

Not an actual quote, and in Rome “for” is interpretive as the act rendering one washed and regenerate, and made good enough inside for Heaven, even if the soul is morally incognizant and baptism is possible performed by an atheist (“intending to do as the church does”), while Scripture shows and states that it is the faith that baptism requires and expresses that is salvific and appropriates justification by faith. (Acts 10;43-47; 15:7-9; Rm. 4:1-7ff) Thus begins the false gospel of Rome, which process usually ends with souls becomes good enough to enter Heaven through suffering in mythical Roman purgatory commencing at death.

Again not an actual quote, and only directly supportive of the resurrection. 1Thes. 4:17 and Rv. 20:6 better supports the latter for the regenerate, which few RCs are. .

Again not an actual quote, while it begins the false Christianized paganism of Catholicism called the Eucharist.

At least “blessed be God” is a direct quote, V. 35 in the KJV.

Again not an actual quote, but refers to the Lord, in the midst of a communal meal, which unlike in Catholicism or even most churches, the Lord's Supper was, telling the apostles to drink the cup. (Mt. 26:27; 1Cor. 11:25-27) Obviously the cup represents the wine, but Catholics, while boasting of who literally they take this account, refuse to take drinking the cup literally, as they do when David called water the blood of men and would not drink it, but poured it out like as an offering, as blood was not to be drunken. Though the representative meaning of such should be obvious, Catholics insist on turning the commemorative Supper — in which the members are to “show” the Lord's sacrificial death and resurrection by showing caring unity in the communal meal, effectual recognizing each other as members for whom Christ died, as 1Cor. 11:17-34 teaches — into a Christianized version of endo-cannibalism.

In the Catholic imagination, NT pastors were consecrating bread and distributing it to the people as their primary function, but they cannot find one

More repetition.

Desperate. Far from an actual quote, all this refers to is “grace, whereby we may serve God acceptably with reverence and godly fear” in the light of the coming judgment.

Also far from an actual quote, and it is not about sacrifice per se or the church, but praise and obedience to God and His salvation.

Which is not about an offering of elements, but “Let us lift up our heart with our hands unto God in the heavens.”

Again not an actual quote.

Also far from an actual quote: We give thanks to God and the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, praying always for you.” Did they ever hear of a concordance and Ps. 33:1?

Only the first sentence is an actual quote, and does not mention Heaven and earth being full of His glory, though “The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork”. (Psalms 19:1; cf. 1Chron. 29:11)

An actual quote in the middle sentence.

Not quite an actual quote and from an apocryphal book that supports prayer for souls which died due to moral sin, which Rome disallows prayer as being effectual for.

Far from an actual quote, and there is nothing here about transubstantiation. At all.

Actual quotes, while the devil also quotes Scripture (Mt. 4) and thus the meaning is what matters.

Not an actual quote, and it is not when Catholics presume to consume physical flesh that the Lord's death is shown. but by how communal meal shows Christ's death for the church as the body of Christ. That is the body of Christ in the chapter referenced.

Also far from an actual quote but an imposed meaning. If John 6:51 was literal, then Catholics gain spiritual and eternal life (Jn. 6:53,54) by consuming human body parts and will never die, but NOWHERE is spiritual and eternal life obtained by physically eating anything, but by believing the gospel message. (Acts 10:43; 15:7-9; Eph. 1:13) out of a broken heart and contrite spirit. (Ps. 34:18) Thanks be to God.

Also far from an actual quote. It is not by partaking of the Lord Supper that the members become gathered into one by the Holy Spirit, but they practically show it. And if this is referring to the literal body and blood of Christ, then pagans also partake of the literal body and blood of their deities in partaking of their religious feats. (1 Cor.10:20-21)

Again not an actual quote and refers to praying for souls that died because of mortal sin, with no evidence to presume repentance. “Now under the coats of every one that was slain they found things consecrated to the idols of the Jamnites, which is forbidden the Jews by the law. Then every man saw that this was the cause wherefore they were slain. “(2Ma 12:40)

Again not even close to an actual quote or a text that supports PTDS. Not even close. Contrived support for a contrive doctrine.

A direct quote. Amazing how much Scripture is actually used! /Sar

There is not much left, but at this Amen I am going to stop here due to fatigue and time considerations, while more examination would only show more that this proffered proof of Scripture in Mass is absurd. The attendants are not even being directed to Scripture as the source, very few are even actual quotes, and most of what they hear they is referenced in your particular document is the same week after week, thus how are they becoming taught much Scripture? Much less correctly? Again, did you really think that any Protestant claim that the Mass had less Scripture was referring to how many things one can give references for, valid or not! Absurd!!! any such claim refers to how much of Scripture is read and exposited in a comprehensive manner. Now you know why “contrived is a fitting word to describe your contest.

1,150 posted on 04/11/2014 11:32:42 AM PDT by daniel1212 (Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1056 | View Replies ]


To: daniel1212

God bless you, dan, for all your hard work in providing references like that.


1,154 posted on 04/11/2014 12:22:34 PM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1150 | View Replies ]

To: daniel1212

” But as often with the catechism, it appears Scripture texts are carelessly added for support after the doctrine is written, not as actually based upon it.”

You said it all right here... And unfortunately, not being conversant with God’s Word, they don’t understand.


1,157 posted on 04/11/2014 1:55:21 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1150 | View Replies ]

To: daniel1212

Lutheran Divine Service settings are similar, without the Marian and Apochryphal references. The sermon is based on a Biblical text. I could have submitted the Matins order of worship especially since it didn’t have to be ‘word for word’ out of the Scripture. I really enjoyed the different ‘Amen’ citations that incurred credit for another passage. LOL. Really nice work on that post.


1,158 posted on 04/11/2014 1:59:14 PM PDT by xone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1150 | View Replies ]

To: daniel1212
>> Now you know why “contrived is a fitting word to describe your contest.<<

I would dare bet against that.

1,177 posted on 04/11/2014 3:45:07 PM PDT by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1150 | View Replies ]

To: daniel1212; Jim Robinson; LurkingSince'98; Alex Murphy; metmom; aMorePerfectUnion; xone; ...
I am amazed at the amount of work you put into that, dear brother in Christ, thank you!

The Scripture reference for "Amen!" caught my eye the first time LurkingSince'98 raised it because a Protestant Service can become quite full of Amens!

To that end, in the following song - one of my most beloved - there are at least 35 "amens" - and the Gospel story to boot, which would entail Scripture references on end. I'm not asking you to do the parsing and tallying, but I'm certain that the number of Scripture references in just this one song would be huge.

Any hoot, dear brothers and sisters in Christ, and especially you Jim Robinson - here's Amen!

1,198 posted on 04/11/2014 7:43:10 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1150 | View Replies ]

To: daniel1212
WOW! You put a lot of work into that. I had thought about doing the same thing until I realized that it would both BE a lot of work and would probably not make any difference to the minds already made up. There are some who imagine a superiority in all things over those who are not joined with them in their sola ecclesia. As we have witnessed hundreds of times over the years on this forum, the ONLY way truth breaks through delusion is when the Holy Spirit illuminates it to the hearts of those who are diligently seeking it. Thank you for your efforts. I truly believe they WILL be used of God.
1,228 posted on 04/11/2014 11:38:43 PM PDT by boatbums (Simul justis et peccator.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1150 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson