Is the writer of this verbal hissy fit, Brian McCall, JD, a lawyer, a member of the pro-sodomy persuasion?
It seems odd for any real religious scholar to claim, even just by implication, that The Roman Catholic Universal Church is a democracy, subject to modification by random and arbitrary consensus and popular vote.
For me, the validity of a religious challenge is not proportional to the number of words used in the "argument."
If there is no clear understanding of right and wrong, and its susceptibility for arbitrary change, it can't be much of a religion.
“the validity of a religious challenge is not proportional to the number of words used in the “argument.””
Truth tends to be simple. Obfuscation often indicates a bill of goods.