Not to me. But I was just wondering about it for those that think it’s some sort of self defense. Is it a vengeance thing completely up to the victim of the rape or does that option get taken away if the ‘threat’ of the rape-produced unborn person can be removed without killing them?
Personally I wouldn’t want to tell someone that they had to be murdered because the technology at the time wasn’t up to snuff.
FReegards
Phrase it another way and it becomes clearer. Is it appropriate to put one person in mortal jeopardy because of the crimes of a different person?