Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Sherman Logan

Interestingly, the Brits are saying that if the facility isn’t used for charitable purposes to benefit the general public, then it is not an exempt facility.

I don’t know that there were any laws like this in place during Jesus’ day, do you?

The mormons willingly went into England, ironic since our forefathers fled England due to religious persecution...


301 posted on 03/05/2014 6:50:24 AM PST by SZonian (Throwing our allegiances to political parties in the long run gave away our liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]


To: SZonian; Sherman Logan
Interestingly, the Brits are saying that if the facility isn’t used for charitable purposes to benefit the general public, then it is not an exempt facility.

I'm curious as to where you got this information.

The UK House of Lords opinion that was appealed to the European Human Rights Council in France was Gallagher (Valuation Officer) v. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints.

In rendering an opinion in Gallgaher, the five-Lord Appellate Committee relied on a 1964 UK case styled Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. Henning (Valuation Officer) AC 420.

Both Henning and Gallagher held that a LDS Temple was not exempt from council tax because the Temple was not a “place of public religious worship.”

I find nothing in the opinion mentioning charitable purposes or the lack thereof as affecting exemption.

306 posted on 03/05/2014 7:43:12 AM PST by Scoutmaster (I'd rather be at Philmont)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson