Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mormon Church’s human rights complaint rejected by European judges
Telegraph ^ | March 4, 2014 | Hayley Dixon

Posted on 03/04/2014 10:46:18 AM PST by greyfoxx39

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 561-580581-600601-620621-630 next last
To: Mr Rogers; HiTech RedNeck; svcw; All
Get my point? That is the sort of statement I cannot imagine a Christian making.

Says the guy who kept telling me that I obviously have never read the Bible! Is that what loving, honest, hugging Christians like yourself do?

According to your posts, the average Mormon is head and shoulders above you in morality.

There is a strong possibility of this. Human beings are capable of intense discipline. Too bad it can't save them nor wrest the wickedness from their heart!

I don’t doubt you on that.

Another Christian statement!

"The Pharisee stood and prayed thus with himself, God, I thank thee, that I am not as other men are, extortioners, unjust, adulterers, or even as this publican. I fast twice in the week, I give tithes of all that I possess. And the publican, standing afar off, would not lift up so much as his eyes unto heaven, but smote upon his breast, saying, God be merciful to me a sinner. I tell you, this man went down to his house justified rather than the other: for every one that exalteth himself shall be abased; and he that humbleth himself shall be exalted."(Luk 18:11-14)

581 posted on 03/07/2014 3:30:55 PM PST by Greetings_Puny_Humans (I mostly come out at night... mostly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 578 | View Replies]

To: svcw

All Protestants are schismatic Catholics. It is the nature of their belief. Are you a Baptist?


582 posted on 03/07/2014 7:02:42 PM PST by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 562 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD

No
I am a Christian


583 posted on 03/07/2014 7:25:33 PM PST by svcw (Not 'hope and change' but 'dopes in chains')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 582 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD

I identify as simply Christian
I am not a baptist


584 posted on 03/07/2014 7:27:18 PM PST by svcw (Not 'hope and change' but 'dopes in chains')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 582 | View Replies]

To: svcw

What is the origin of your Christian doctrines and beliefs?


585 posted on 03/08/2014 5:03:39 AM PST by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 584 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD

Jesus Christ


586 posted on 03/08/2014 6:03:10 AM PST by svcw (Not 'hope and change' but 'dopes in chains')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 585 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD

The question is why is using the words of lds leaders hate or whatever the current words are today


587 posted on 03/08/2014 6:04:37 AM PST by svcw (Not 'hope and change' but 'dopes in chains')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 585 | View Replies]

To: svcw

The one who is the Jehovah of the Old Testament and named Jesus Christ in the New Testament of the Bible, that Jesus Christ?

Do you believe his words?


588 posted on 03/08/2014 10:58:02 AM PST by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 586 | View Replies]

To: svcw

You answered your question yourself. Perhaps the answer was insufficient or incorrect? Is that why you keep asking me?

The Greek of the New Testament recorded as the Lord’s Supper has Christ saying eat of my body and drink of my blood - literally. Christ says “eat me”. That’s the Greek. It’s the origin of the Catholic Church’s belief in transubstantiation.

Jews, Greeks and others used those words to attack Christians as cannibals.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecution_of_Christians_in_the_Roman_Empire#Public_interest_in_persecution

Normal adults understand that context matters.


589 posted on 03/08/2014 11:12:52 AM PST by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 587 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD

I believe Jesus Christ’s Word
That is still not what I asked: why is quoting lds leaders hate?


590 posted on 03/08/2014 12:10:00 PM PST by svcw (Not 'hope and change' but 'dopes in chains' hen I ask t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 588 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD

It appears you are not going to answer my original inquiry, there is no point in you doing whatever it you are doing to avoid answering.
Let’s leave it at, you don’t know, it’s just something you write.


591 posted on 03/08/2014 12:42:45 PM PST by svcw (Not 'hope and change' but 'dopes in chains' hen I ask t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 589 | View Replies]

To: svcw
It appears you are not going to answer my original inquiry

Quoting Millet...."he's answering the question you SHOULD have asked....

I believe this poster to be one of the "I'm not a mormon but..." that we see all the time on these threads....lyin' for the lard.

592 posted on 03/08/2014 12:47:55 PM PST by greyfoxx39 (We can thank Mitt Romney for the present situation in our country. His feet are made of clay.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 591 | View Replies]

To: svcw

You answered your question yourself. Perhaps the answer was insufficient or incorrect? Is that why you keep asking me?

The Greek of the New Testament recorded as the Lord’s Supper has Christ saying eat of my body and drink of my blood - literally. Christ says “eat me”. That’s the Greek. It’s the origin of the Catholic Church’s belief in transubstantiation.

Jews, Greeks and others used those words to attack Christians as cannibals.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecution_of_Christians_in_the_Roman_Empire#Public_interest_in_persecution

Normal adults understand that context matters.


593 posted on 03/08/2014 1:06:51 PM PST by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 590 | View Replies]

Comment #594 Removed by Moderator

To: Mr Rogers
Reading the mind of another Freeper is a form of "making it personal."

Discuss the issues all you want, but do not make it personal.

595 posted on 03/08/2014 2:32:06 PM PST by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 545 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39

Oh yea, forgot about that video...teaching lds to lie.


596 posted on 03/08/2014 3:27:06 PM PST by svcw (Not 'hope and change' but 'dopes in chains' hen I ask t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 592 | View Replies]

Comment #597 Removed by Moderator

To: Elsie

Mar 9, 1843 - William Clayton goes for an afternoon walk with Joseph Smith: “the prophet invited me to walk with him. During our walk he said he had learned that there was a sister back in England to whom I was very much attached. I replied there was, but nothing farther than an attachment such as a brother and sister in the church might rightfully entertain for each other. He then said, ‘Why don’t you send for her?’ I replied, ‘In the first place I have no authority to send for her, and if I had, I have not the means to pay expenses.’ To this he answered, ‘I give you authority to send for her, and I will furnish you the means,’ which he did. This was the first time the prophet Joseph talked with me on the subject of plural marriage. He informed me that the doctrine and principle was right in the sight of our Heavenly Father, and that it was a doctrine which pertained to celestial order & glory. After giving me lengthy instructions and information concerning the doctrine of celestial or plural marriage he concluded his remarks by the words, ‘It is your privilege to have all the wives you want.’”


598 posted on 03/09/2014 6:34:45 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 553 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

Mar 9, 1844 - General Relief-Society president Emma Smith preaches to the Relief Society:”it was high time for Mothers to watch over their Daughters & exhort them to keep the path of Virtue” She then asks “by vote, who would be willing to receive the principles of Virtue, keep the commandments of God.” In a second meeting the same day she asks”all to take heed to their ways; and follow the teachings of Brother Joseph; and when he Preaches against Vice to take heed to it; and said, he meant what he said.” Within a week the Relief Society meetings are discontinued as it is felt that Emma is preaching coded messages against her husband’s secret practice of plural marriage. John Taylor later explained: “the meetings were discontinued” because “Emma Smith the Pres[ident] taught the sisters that the principle of plural marriage . . . was not of God.”


599 posted on 03/09/2014 6:36:15 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 553 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

Mar 9, 1845 - After several women must have approached Brigham Young about resuming regular meetings of the Relief Society, Young tells a meeting of the Seventy that women “have no right to meddle in the affairs of the Kingdom of God [—] outside the pale of this they have a right to meddle because many of them are more sagacious & shrewd & more competent [than men] to attend to things of financial affairs. they never can hold the Priesthood apart from their husbands. When I want Sisters or the Wives of the members of the church to get up Relief Society I will summon them to my aid but until that time let them stay at home & if you see females huddling together . . . and if they say Joseph started it tell them its a damned lied for I know he never encouraged it.”


600 posted on 03/09/2014 6:38:00 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 553 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 561-580581-600601-620621-630 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson