Delay of game, 5 yard penalty.
“’Heterosexuality,’ as a reified ‘sexual orientation’ does bless or sanction, in my mind, various heterosexual sins.”
Should have been:
’Heterosexuality,’ as a reified ‘sexual orientation’ does NOT bless or sanction, in my mind, various heterosexual sins.”
Yikes.
Sorry.
sitetest
I didn’t notice what you considered an error because I thought your first statement was accurate. I think that setting up “heterosexuality,” which is “good and natural,” as a category opposite “homosexuality,” which is “unnatural and abhorrent,” does tend to vitiate heterosexual sins, because, after all, “It’s only natural, it’s the way I was made.”
I don’t think this is required by logic, but I think it naturally follows, because it makes “What one does with Mr. Wiggles” *the* identity-defining characteristic of a person.