Even Staples would be right in disagreeing with that, as Osteen mixes Truth with critical error, as does Staples and Rome, the former less arrogantly.
Jesus probably looked pretty boring, like the Eucharist before us, so wed study the Truth He gave rather than the charisma and fashion.
Jesus never looked like a wafer of bread, nor is He ever that, nor did He preach physically consuming human flesh was the necessary means to obtain spiritual and eternal life. Critical error .
And it only took the Holy Spirit 1200 years to get around to revealing that so-called "truth" to the church.
"He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, dwelleth in me, and I in him."
"For my flesh is meat indeed, and my blood is drink indeed"
"And as they were eating, Jesus took bread, and blessed it, and brake it, and gave it to the disciples, and said, Take, eat; this is my body. And He took the cup, and gave thanks, and gave it to them, saying, Drink ye all of it; For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins."
So to Protestants, the bible is ALWAYS literal...Um, except when it isn't. The source you linked actually claims that Jesus was restricted and could not possibly be in two places at once! Somebody get God on the horn and tell Him He can't perform miracles.