Counter your assertion that pro-lifers are for “raping a raped woman again, but instead of using a penis, you want to use a law.”?
Or that you arguing a pro-abortion argument of “I’m arguing against is forcing women impregnated by rape to bear those children without their consent.” isn’t a pro-abortion argument?
The first one, ansel.
But you’re more than welcome to take a swing at either, because so far you are batting a big, fat zero.
From what I can see, most people on this page do not even remotely understand my argument.